2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning fork microgyrometers: Narrow gap vs. wide gap design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that the IPMCs vibrate in phase, with nearly identical phase lags between them, and that their amplitudes are highly comparable, with larger vibrations attained for the internal IPMCs. Such a response is primarily associated with the eigenvector in in equation ( 13) whose components share nearly the same phase and have an amplitude that increases from the first and last entries towards the central entry, in the whole frequency range [61,62].…”
Section: Underwater Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that the IPMCs vibrate in phase, with nearly identical phase lags between them, and that their amplitudes are highly comparable, with larger vibrations attained for the internal IPMCs. Such a response is primarily associated with the eigenvector in in equation ( 13) whose components share nearly the same phase and have an amplitude that increases from the first and last entries towards the central entry, in the whole frequency range [61,62].…”
Section: Underwater Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate estimation of the hydrodynamic loading on flexible structures vibrating in liquids is of fundamental importance in the study of microelectromechanical systems, such as atomic force microscope probes [1][2][3][4] and radio frequency switches [5][6][7][8][9]; sensors and energy harvesting devices [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]; miniature propulsion systems across biology [17,18] and engineering [19][20][21][22][23]; and naval structures [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at its mechanical structure, a QTF can be considered as two cantilevers (prongs) joined at a common base. The inplane flexural modes of vibrations of the QTFs can be classified into two groups: symmetrical modes, where the prongs moves along the same direction, and anti-symmetrical modes, where the two prongs oscillate along opposite directions [18,19]. The in-plane anti-symmetrical modes are the predominant ones when a sound source is positioned between the prongs, forcing them to move in the opposite directions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%