2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning cell adhesion on polymeric and nanocomposite surfaces: Role of topography versus superhydrophobicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After in vitro cell culture for 6 days, the cells showed varying degrees of adhesion to these four surfaces, thereby confirming that surface morphology influences cell adhesion. Similar results were obtained on PP surfaces with different topographies and moisture contents . In this way, by controlling the surface morphology within specific ranges, it is possible to promote cell adhesion.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After in vitro cell culture for 6 days, the cells showed varying degrees of adhesion to these four surfaces, thereby confirming that surface morphology influences cell adhesion. Similar results were obtained on PP surfaces with different topographies and moisture contents . In this way, by controlling the surface morphology within specific ranges, it is possible to promote cell adhesion.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar results were obtained on PP surfaces with different topographies and moisture contents. 34 In this way, by controlling the surface morphology within specific ranges, it is possible to promote cell adhesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MTT-quantified adhesion test reports the number of cells that adheres to the composite and remains viable. The SEM-quantified adhesion test offers insight into the location and morphology of adherent cells [32].The results of the MTT-quantified adhesion test quantified showed a significant decrease in the number of viable cells that were exposed directly to the COF and CDT composites compared with the NC in both experimental periods (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As an approach to rectify these problems many attempts have been employed to change the structure of surface chemicals to promote cell adhesion and proliferation as achieved with the use of layer by layer or surface grafting . However, for a woven fabric, such as polyethylene glycol terephthalate (PET), the structural parameters seem to exert a greater impact upon cell adhesion than that of the chemical structure . Due to the special warp/weft weaving structure of woven fabrics, their surfaces lack the flat uniformity that can be achieved with polymeric films or electrospinning nanofibers films; a condition that results from interlacing among yarns where the pore size was also larger than that on films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%