Tumour delineation in oesophageal cancer – A prospective study of delineation in PET and CT with and without endoscopically placed clip markers

Thomas, Lena; Lapa, C; Bundschuh, Ralph A.; Polat, Bülent; Sonke, Jan‐Jakob; Gückenberger, Matthias

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.007

Cited by 24 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, inflammation also causes increased FDG uptake. As inflammation often appears around esophageal tumors (115)(116)(117), this could lead to an overestimation of tumor volume. As proper volume segmentation is of importance for the calculation of textural parameters, the effects on esophageal tumor volume measurements by using FDG-PET information in addition to CT images was further examined in study III.…”

Section: Study II -Comparison Of Semiautomated and Manual Segmentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Texture analysis of computed tomography data using morphologic and metabolic delineation of esophageal cancer—relation to tumor type and neoadjuvant therapy response

Zhang

Herlin

Rouvelas

et al. 2018

Diseases of the Esophagus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Study II -Comparison Of Semiautomated and Manual Segmentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Texture analysis of computed tomography data using morphologic and metabolic delineation of esophageal cancer—relation to tumor type and neoadjuvant therapy response

Zhang

Herlin

Rouvelas

et al. 2018

Diseases of the Esophagus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our study, the caudal variation was not significantly reduced after PET addition in lower thoracic and EGJ tumours. Endoscopy-guided clipping or fiducial insertion at the distal tumour border might overcome this difficulty [16] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Endoscopy-guided clipping or fiducial insertion at the tumour borders might serve as a valid option for GTV definition, although this adds an additional invasive procedure [16] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gross tumour delineation on computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer: A nationwide study

Nowee

Voncken

Kotte

et al. 2019

Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CT exhibits high density and spatial resolution and is very effective at demarcating esophageal borders and illustrating its association with surrounding tissues and organs. Currently CT scan imaging is the main foundation of esophageal gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation [ 15 ]. The thickness of normal esophageal wall varies due to different degrees of expansion; however, the wall thickness is usually less than 3mm.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival based radiographic-grouping for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma may impact clinical T stage

Cai

Lu²,

et al. 2018

Oncotarget

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most patients diagnosed with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have progressed beyond surgical resection as a therapeutic option. Difficulties in the proper assessment of tumor invasion depth before treatment complicate determination of the type and extent of therapy. Therefore, accurate tumor clinical staging is a necessity for identifying treatment options and aiding in patient prognosis. We investigated radiographic factors as prognostic indicators for survival in ESCC. Between July 2006 - July 2010, 324 thoracic ESCC patients who underwent surgery were selected. All patients received contrast enhanced preoperative chest CT scans and esophageal barium swallow examinations. Measurement of maximal lesion cross-sectional area, the largest long diameter, largest short diameter, CT-indicated lesion length, barium-indicated lesion length and the length of pericardial fat reduction were performed. Relationships between these indicators and post-surgical survival time and the cutoff values of related factors were analyzed. Maximum long diameter, maximum lesion area and lesion length, as measured by CT imaging, were correlated with survival. Survival effects were clearly associated with group intervals, calculated by a genetic algorithm, and tumor stages. Risk-stratification intervals of esophageal lesions from radiographic imaging included: maximum long diameter < 28.7, 28.7-34.6mm, 34.6-41.4mm and >41.4mm; maximum lesion area < 355.8mm2, 355.8-568.0mm2, 568.0-907.3mm2 and >907.3mm2; and CT-indicated lesion length <30.9mm, 30.9-57.3mm, 57.3-70.6mm and > 70.6mm. The reasonable stratification of maximum esophageal lesion area, largest long diameter and lesion length measured in CT is valuable for clinical T staging of ESCC. Radiographic parameters may have prognostic clinical value in the staging of esophageal carcinoma.

show abstract

Tumour delineation in oesophageal cancer – A prospective study of delineation in PET and CT with and without endoscopically placed clip markers

Cited by 24 publications

References 45 publications

Texture analysis of computed tomography data using morphologic and metabolic delineation of esophageal cancer—relation to tumor type and neoadjuvant therapy response

Texture analysis of computed tomography data using morphologic and metabolic delineation of esophageal cancer—relation to tumor type and neoadjuvant therapy response

Gross tumour delineation on computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer: A nationwide study

Survival based radiographic-grouping for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma may impact clinical T stage

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About