2018
DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.12.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor location impact in stage II and III colon cancer: epidemiological and outcome evaluation

Abstract: Prognostic impact of tumor location should be considered as a stratification factor in the future clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we found a higher age in women compared to men (74 vs. 71 years, p = 0.001). Of CCs, 59.3 % were right-sided with a slightly higher incidence in women [32]. The PETACC-8 study reported a percentage of 38.9 % and the NO147 trial 50 % of right-sided cancers [21].…”
Section: Clinical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Next, we found a higher age in women compared to men (74 vs. 71 years, p = 0.001). Of CCs, 59.3 % were right-sided with a slightly higher incidence in women [32]. The PETACC-8 study reported a percentage of 38.9 % and the NO147 trial 50 % of right-sided cancers [21].…”
Section: Clinical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Colon cancer ranks third among the gastrointestinal cancers, and its morbidity and mortality rates in men are higher than those in women (3). The 5years survival rate of colon cancer after radical operation is about 60-70%, and the main reasons leading to the failure of surgical treatment are post-operative recurrence and metastasis (4,5). Therefore, the discovery of valuable molecular markers is important for the early prediction and treatment of colon cancer recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also reported the prognostic impact of tumour location for stage II/III CC. Two hundred and three patients with stage II/III CC were analysed, and it was found that 5‐year OS was significantly worse in RCC than in LCC (65% versus 82%, HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.05–4.09; P = 0.03) 29 . A systemic review and meta‐analysis of prognostic survival associated with tumour localization was reported in Italy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%