2008
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20072602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor angiogenesis and progression are enhanced by Sema4D produced by tumor-associated macrophages

Abstract: Increased evidence suggests that cancer-associated inflammation supports tumor growth and progression. We have previously shown that semaphorin 4D (Sema4D), a ligand produced by different cell types, is a proangiogenic molecule that acts by binding to its receptor, plexin B1, expressed on endothelial cells (Conrotto, P., D. Valdembri, S. Corso, G. Serini, L. Tamagnone, P.M. Comoglio, F. Bussolino, and S. Giordano. 2005. Blood. 105:4321–4329). The present work highlights the role of Sema4D produced by the tumor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
202
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
202
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, former data demonstrated soluble SEMA4D protein released from the breast cancer cell surface acted on local as well as distant tumor microenvironments, thus inducing tumor angiogenesis and metastasis (Basile et al, 2007). Furthermore, the same authors showed SEMA4D produced by TAMs not tumor cells per se enhanced tumor growth and angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (Sierra et al, 2008). The authors explained the seemingly contradictory results possibly due to differences between these tumor cell lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, former data demonstrated soluble SEMA4D protein released from the breast cancer cell surface acted on local as well as distant tumor microenvironments, thus inducing tumor angiogenesis and metastasis (Basile et al, 2007). Furthermore, the same authors showed SEMA4D produced by TAMs not tumor cells per se enhanced tumor growth and angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (Sierra et al, 2008). The authors explained the seemingly contradictory results possibly due to differences between these tumor cell lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This scenario is now changed as some in vitro studies have made clear that M1 macrophages are only cytotoxic to tumor cells but not to normal cells and, therefore, these M1 cells help in the early eradication of neotrasfromed cells [48][49][50][51][52][53]. Another way by which M1 macrophages exert their antitumor activity is through their antagonistic action on tumor-promoting action of TAMs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), M2 macrophages, regulatory macrophages, and immature myeloid cells (i.e., all these cells suppress adaptive tumor-specific immune response and promote tumor growth and development) [54][55][56][57][58][59]. The exact role of macrophages in early stages of cancer is still controversial and yet to be determined.…”
Section: Classically Activated Macrophages (M1 Macrophages)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tyrosine phosphorylation of MET results in its activation and the recruitment of signaling effectors, such as the adaptor proteins Grb2 and Gab-1, which in turn promote the activation of diverse downstream signaling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT, Ras/RAF/MEK/ERK, PLC-g, FAK, and STAT3 pathways (4). Thereby, HGF-induced MET activation regulates a diverse set of biologic responses that include cell proliferation, survival, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and branching morphogenesis (5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%