2003
DOI: 10.1002/art.11206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumid lupus erythematosus: Criteria for classification with immunohistochemical analysis

Abstract: Comprehensive clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical criteria for the classification of tumid LE are proposed that differentiate tumid LE from other cutaneous disorders that may be clinically and histologically indistinguishable. The chronic, benign course indicates that tumid LE be classified as a form of chronic cutaneous LE, although it may be a cutaneous feature of systemic LE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
71
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(47 reference statements)
8
71
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that not only sun exposure but any other environmental factor might be involved in the provocation of LET lesions. Moreover, although direct immunofluorescence staining of skin specimens was positive in 50% of the Japanese cases, which was much higher than that reported in Kuhn's report [15], another group has reported similar results to ours [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These findings suggest that not only sun exposure but any other environmental factor might be involved in the provocation of LET lesions. Moreover, although direct immunofluorescence staining of skin specimens was positive in 50% of the Japanese cases, which was much higher than that reported in Kuhn's report [15], another group has reported similar results to ours [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…8,9 No doubt, the flux of CD4 T cells caused by HIV infection and intermittent HAART partly underlies the T-cell immunohistochemical findings that we have observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Skin biopsy histopathology showed moderately dense superficial and deep perivascular and periappendageal lymphocytic infiltrate with dilatation of capillaries in the upper dermis and abundant deposits of mucin in the reticular dermis. The dermoepidermal junction and epidermis was relatively spared by the infiltrate and the epidermis was slightly flattened (Figure 2), and this was consistent with lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) 4 . She showed no evidence of systemic involvement.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 69%