2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH of the vagina gradually increases with continuous promotion of pregnancy and is significantly increased compared with that in nonpregnancy. The increase in the pH value inevitably reduces the resistance of the vagina to external microorganisms and affects its microenvironment [7]. Mycoplasma and Chlamydia are common pathogens infecting the reproductive tract of women during pregnancy [8].…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Vaginal Microecology During The Gestatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH of the vagina gradually increases with continuous promotion of pregnancy and is significantly increased compared with that in nonpregnancy. The increase in the pH value inevitably reduces the resistance of the vagina to external microorganisms and affects its microenvironment [7]. Mycoplasma and Chlamydia are common pathogens infecting the reproductive tract of women during pregnancy [8].…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Vaginal Microecology During The Gestatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it can be performed in an outpatient clinic, transcervical tubal occlusion is associated with significant cost savings compared with tubal ligation procedures; however, this cost savings may not be as great when both procedures are performed in the operating room setting. [27][28][29] At this time, access to transcervical permanent contraceptive procedures may be limited by a lack of trained providers and by the cost of the device; in some cases the cost is borne by the hospital, which may limit numbers, while in other cases it is borne by the individual, who may find it too costly as a contraceptive option.…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysteroscopic sterilization with the Essure device saves between $111 and $2075 when compared with various laparoscopic approaches. [30][31][32][33][34] Although the Essure device is more expensive than laparoscopic devices, overall costs are lowered when the outpatient location, faster recovery, [30][31][32][33] and less time away from daily activities 33 are considered.…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%