2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00160-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsing Ma bridge deck under skew winds—Part I: Aerodynamic coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected for such a sharp edged cross-section, the drag coefficient shows little dependence on u 0 , but decreases for increasing yaw angles, in agreement with the observations of Zhu et al (2002). The drag coefficient C d for the Lysefjord bridge deck was for design purposes set equal to 1.0, and its derivative equal to zero.…”
Section: Drag Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As expected for such a sharp edged cross-section, the drag coefficient shows little dependence on u 0 , but decreases for increasing yaw angles, in agreement with the observations of Zhu et al (2002). The drag coefficient C d for the Lysefjord bridge deck was for design purposes set equal to 1.0, and its derivative equal to zero.…”
Section: Drag Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the case of the Pescara footbridge the yaw angle θ approaches values of 54° close to the end. Experimental tests on the Tsing Ma Bridge (Zhu et al., a, b) showed that for a low reduced velocity, approximately V*<8÷11, the application of the skew wind theory provided results very close to experimental values. Also the so‐called “Wind Y” NSs of Table provided Vcr values always greater than that in NS A.…”
Section: Fe Model Updating According To the Skewed Wind Theory And Vamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(), it is certainly more appropriate to define aerodynamic coefficients directly from wind‐tunnel tests (Zasso et al., ). The problem of deck curvature should also be considered, but the available literature is limited (Zhu et al., a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brito and Riera introduced a peculiar experimental method to study how to sure static force coefficients in the condition of aeroelastic instability [37] . Based on sing Ma Bridge , six components coefficients of bridge deck of suspension bridge is determined by Zhu Ledong [38] . Tubino discussed the relationship of aerodynamic admittance function and flutter derivatives and static force coefficients [39] .…”
Section: The Significant and Status Of Aerodynamic Interferene Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%