2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truxene/triazatruxene-based conjugated microporous polymers with flexible@rigid mutualistic symbiosis for efficient CO2 storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, these polymers exhibit dramatically higher CO 2 adsorption capacities of 1.5, 1.28, and 2.18 mmol g −1 for C‐TPB, S‐TPB, and SO‐TPB, respectively. Notably, the CO 2 adsorption capacity of SO‐TPB is comparable with many of the reported organic porous polymers, such as polythiophene networks (0.48−2.75 mmol g −1 ), [32d] porphyrin based CMPs (1.24−2.02 mmol g −1 ), [ 33 ] truxene‐based CMPs (1.32−2.62 mmol g −1 ), [ 34 ] etc. At 298 K near‐atmospheric pressure, SO‐TPB also exhibits the largest CO 2 adsorption of 1.24 mmol g −1 , while C‐TPB and S‐TPB with lower BET possess a lower CO 2 uptake of around 0.81 mmol g −1 , which might be due to the decreased pore walls for CO 2 adsorption (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast, these polymers exhibit dramatically higher CO 2 adsorption capacities of 1.5, 1.28, and 2.18 mmol g −1 for C‐TPB, S‐TPB, and SO‐TPB, respectively. Notably, the CO 2 adsorption capacity of SO‐TPB is comparable with many of the reported organic porous polymers, such as polythiophene networks (0.48−2.75 mmol g −1 ), [32d] porphyrin based CMPs (1.24−2.02 mmol g −1 ), [ 33 ] truxene‐based CMPs (1.32−2.62 mmol g −1 ), [ 34 ] etc. At 298 K near‐atmospheric pressure, SO‐TPB also exhibits the largest CO 2 adsorption of 1.24 mmol g −1 , while C‐TPB and S‐TPB with lower BET possess a lower CO 2 uptake of around 0.81 mmol g −1 , which might be due to the decreased pore walls for CO 2 adsorption (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The CO 2 capture performance of CMPs was evaluated at 273 and 298 K (Figure 1c). At 273 K and 1 bar, in comparison with P2 (34.4 cm 3 g −1 ) and P3 (38.5 cm 3 g −1 ), the CO 2 uptake of P1 (46.6 cm 3 g −1 ) is significantly higher and the value competes with the best performing porous polymer materials such as conjugated microporous polythiophenes (10.74–61.89 cm 3 g −1 ), [ 29 ] porphyrin‐based CMPs (27.3–45.18 cm 3 g −1 ), [ 30 ] triazatruxene‐based CMPs (39.90–90.02 cm 3 g −1 ), [ 31 ] etc. Moreover, the CMPs show CO 2 absorption capacities at 298 K and 1.0 bar, with P1 showing the highest CO 2 uptake capacity of 29.2 cm 3 g −1 , while 19.9 and 24.6 cm 3 g −1 are found for P2 and P3, respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous organic polymers are covalently bound organic polymers with abundant nanopores, including conjugated organic polymers (COPs), hyper-cross-linked polymers (HCPs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and so on. On account of an extended π conjugated skeleton, inherent three-dimensional pores, designable structure, and high physicochemical stability, COPs are considered promising materials to be utilized in energy storage, gas adsorption, catalysis, sensing, and light-harvesting. In 2007, the use of carbonyl derivative conjugated polymers as positive electrodes of lithium-ion batteries is the first time that COP materials were used in the aspect of energy storage . It is noteworthy that the stable skeleton can bring good support ability and also provide abundant binding sites for the anchoring of anions and cations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%