1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01064102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth in Frege's ?law of truth?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Textor (2010) and Jarvis (2012) develop related ideas. 35 See also development of this argument by Kemp (1998) and the reply by Heck (2002). 36 The depth of Frege's commitment to this view is not clear, however.…”
Section: Closing: Frege and Deflationismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 Textor (2010) and Jarvis (2012) develop related ideas. 35 See also development of this argument by Kemp (1998) and the reply by Heck (2002). 36 The depth of Frege's commitment to this view is not clear, however.…”
Section: Closing: Frege and Deflationismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Log97, This argument is extremely puzzling. Some commentators have found in it an argument that there is no real property of truth at all (Ricketts, 1986;Kemp, 1995). But one would need a very strong argument indeed for this sort of claim, since there are so many places in Frege's writings where he seems to make serious use of semantic notions like reference and truth (Heck, 2010;Heck, 2012, Ch.…”
Section: The Regress Argument: Why Truth Is Not a Predicatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Views in this vincinity have been expressed by van Heijenoort (1967),Dreben and van Heijenoort (1986),Ricketts (1986a;1986b),Weiner (1990),Kemp (1995), andGoldfarb (2001),…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We borrow the term 'content-redundancy' from GaryKemp (1998). Kemp understands the argument differently from how we do, but we think he was right to highlight the connection between it and the regress argument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%