Truth and deception

Jacobs, S. F.; Brashers, Dale E.; Dawson, Edwin J.

doi:10.1080/03637759609376378

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, to the extent that interactive exchanges are the more familiar mode of communication, participants may find them less challenging than noninteractive communications. From a conversational analysis perspective, the significance of interactive processes may lie in the interpretive frame they provide (e.g., Brown & Levinson, 1987; Grice, 1989; Jacobs, Brashers, & Dawson, 1996; McCornack, 1992). For example, whether a person has provided too little, too much, unclear, or irrelevant information in response to an inquiry is more readily assessed within the context of the conversation than apart from it.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cues to deception.

DePaulo

Lindsay

Malone

et al. 2003

Psychological Bulletin

2,009

131

2,487

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Do people behave differently when they are lying compared with when they are telling the truth? The combined results of 1,338 estimates of 158 cues to deception are reported. Results show that in some ways, liars are less forthcoming than truth tellers, and they tell less compelling tales. They also make a more negative impression and are more tense. Their stories include fewer ordinary imperfections and unusual contents. However, many behaviors showed no discernible links, or only weak links, to deceit. Cues to deception were more pronounced when people were motivated to succeed, especially when the motivations were identity relevant rather than monetary or material. Cues to deception were also stronger when lies were about transgressions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cues to deception.

DePaulo

Lindsay

Malone

et al. 2003

Psychological Bulletin

2,009

131

2,487

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A ll < A ls , so we would have A > 0. In practice, the surface exposed by the wafer is not pure silicon, but is covered both by a native silicon oxide layer and by a layer of organic molecules adsorbed from the ambient atmosphere [28,29]. The energies at the solid surface are then largely determined by these outermost layers.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dewetting of solvated polymer brushes by thin liquid films

Yerushalmi‐Rozen

Klein

1997

J. Phys.: Condens. Matter

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thin liquid oligostyrene films on top of a surface-anchored, polystyrene brush - solvated by the oligostyrene itself - roughen spontaneously. Using optical phase-interference microscopy and nuclear reaction analysis we have characterized the topography of such roughened films. We see that the undulations formed reach down at most to approximately the top of the solvated brush, but not to the underlying solid substrate on which the brush is anchored. Possible origins for this behaviour are discussed in terms of a picture wherein the solvated brush is regarded as a quasi-solid substrate for the liquid film on top.

show abstract

“…The episode is thus characterized by deception in several respects. The deception is indirect, to use a term from Jacobs et al (1996):. .…”

Section: Impoliteness In Two Episodes In Timon Of Athensmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…deception can occur when the Quality maxim is covertly violated at the level of what is said (i.e., a direct lie) or at the level of what is implicated (i.e., indirect deception by covertly violating some other maxim). (Jacobs et al, 1996: 99)…”

Section: Impoliteness In Two Episodes In Timon Of Athensmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards characterizing a type of aggravated impoliteness, with examples from Timon of Athens

Rudanko

2017

Language and Literature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article proceeds from the assumption that speakers engaging in verbal interaction are perceived by their interlocutors to have intentions, and it explores the concepts of impoliteness and aggravated impoliteness. Two case studies, both from Shakespeare's Timon of Athens are considered, and it is argued that a distinction between overt and covert intentions and between first-order and second-order intentions is useful in affording a purchase on the nature of deception in conversational interaction. The article thus seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of an aspect of impoliteness theory and to the application of impoliteness theory to the analysis of a Shakespearean play.

show abstract

Truth and deception

Cited by 5 publications

References 4 publications

Cues to deception.

Cues to deception.

Dewetting of solvated polymer brushes by thin liquid films

Towards characterizing a type of aggravated impoliteness, with examples from Timon of Athens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About