2003
DOI: 10.1002/vis.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth and credibility as a double ambition: reconstruction of the built past, experiences and dilemmas

Abstract: The reconstruction of our historical heritage involves a few fundamental problems. We mention only two. There can be many interpretations of scientific data which can result in different reconstructions: however, the appearance of an image or animation in a digital format out of context is nearly always misleading. Therefore, the verisimilitude of the computer‐based image should be questioned in the same manner as a picture in a journal, but the digital medium seldom facilitates this questioning. Furthermore, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Al mismo tiempo, también se nos dice que "la creación y divulgación de las visualizaciones computarizadas se deben planear de tal manera que contribuyan, con el máximo de sus posibilidades, a mejorar el estudio, comprensión, interpretación, conservación y gestión del patrimonio cultural". Y es aquí cuando entra en juego el dilema verosimilitud vs. rigurosidad (BAKKER et al 2003). Como arqueólogos estamos obligados a presentar nuestros datos con el mayor rigor posible, pues, la máxima del proceso de difusión y de cualquier didáctica específica es hacer comprensible los datos sin perder de vista el proceso científico.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Al mismo tiempo, también se nos dice que "la creación y divulgación de las visualizaciones computarizadas se deben planear de tal manera que contribuyan, con el máximo de sus posibilidades, a mejorar el estudio, comprensión, interpretación, conservación y gestión del patrimonio cultural". Y es aquí cuando entra en juego el dilema verosimilitud vs. rigurosidad (BAKKER et al 2003). Como arqueólogos estamos obligados a presentar nuestros datos con el mayor rigor posible, pues, la máxima del proceso de difusión y de cualquier didáctica específica es hacer comprensible los datos sin perder de vista el proceso científico.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…First, there is a socio-cultural objective, as the collective historical memory of a given area is recovered, giving data on the evolution of society; second, there is a clear educational objective which shows details of an abandoned culture and influences positively the teaching and learning process (Rojas-Sola and Lopez-Garcia, 2007b); and third, there is technological interest, as the methodology used in the process of applying computer animation techniques is valuable know-how. The verisimilitude of the image obtained by computer should be questioned in the same way as a figure in a journal, although, it is not common for digital media to do this (Bakker et al, 2003).…”
Section: Industrial Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the problems faced by archaeologists regarding the authority and authenticity of visualisations are summarised by Bakker et al (2003):…”
Section: The Authenticity Of Archaeological Visualisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of yet it can be argued that there are no definite solutions to the problems identified by Bakker et al (2003). One of the first, and perhaps best, attempts to address these issues was by Roberts and Ryan (1997), who created a virtual visualisation which could be interactively changed by the viewer.…”
Section: Addressing These Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%