2017
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2017.1359445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust in family businesses: A more comprehensive empirical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successor's trust in the incumbent is related to the competency, good judgment, support, honesty of information, keeping the words, not taking sides, rewarding, doing the best, willingness to listen to suggestions and opinions (Azizi et al, 2017). This study found that the successor's trust has a positive significant effect on the intention to stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Successor's trust in the incumbent is related to the competency, good judgment, support, honesty of information, keeping the words, not taking sides, rewarding, doing the best, willingness to listen to suggestions and opinions (Azizi et al, 2017). This study found that the successor's trust has a positive significant effect on the intention to stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the family business, trust is more toward the leader. Trust is also about expectation and hope (Azizi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Hypothesis Development Successor's Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most of these studies are of a conceptual nature, many have presented empirical evidence of either a qualitative (Binz Astrachan & Botero, 2017; Blodgett, Dumas, & Zanzi, 2011; Blombäck & Brunninge, 2013; Blombäck & Ramírez-Pasillas, 2012; Carrigan & Buckley, 2008; Haugh & McKee, 2003; Micelotta & Raynard, 2011; Schwartz, 2005; Steier, 2001) or a quantitative nature (Ahlers, Hack, Madison, Wright, & Kellermanns, 2017; Allen, George, & Davis, 2018; Azizi, Salmani Bidgoli, & Seddighian Bidgoli, 2017; Beck & Kenning, 2015; Binz et al, 2013; Binz Astrachan, Patel, & Wanzenried, 2014; Chrisman, Chua, & Kellermanns, 2009; Chrisman, Chua, & Sharma, 1998; Cruz et al, 2010; Deephouse & Jaskiewicz, 2013; Lude & Prügl, in press, 2018; Lyman, 1991; Orth & Green, 2009). Out of these empirical studies, four focused on the trust among family members (Allen et al, 2018; Chrisman et al, 1998; Haugh & McKee, 2003; Steier, 2001), five focused on trust or trustworthiness among family and nonfamily managers or (potential) employees (Azizi et al, 2017; Chrisman et al, 2009; Cruz et al, 2010; Deephouse & Jaskiewicz, 2013; Lyman, 1991), one study measured private equity firms’ trust of family firms (Ahlers et al, 2017), and one study examined trust in the context of nonprofessional investors (Lude & Prügl, in press). The remaining 12 studies empirically investigated consumers’ perception of a family firm as trustworthy, whereof six relied on statements from family firm managers arguing to communicate the family firm’s nature with the goal to evoke consumers’ trust (Binz Astrachan & Botero, 2017; Blodgett et al, 2011; Blombäck & Brunninge, 2013; Blombäck & Ramírez-Pasillas, 2012; Micelotta & Raynard, 2011; Schwartz, 2...…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on the topic of marketing as a business function in family-owned companies mostly focus on marketing communication [1], branding [2], and product portfolio-related topics [3]. Not many existing studies seem to focus on customer relationship management (CRM) [4][5][6][7]. The results of worldwide research on family businesses, conducted by consultant company PwC [8], refer to unpredictable market conditions as one of the major external challenges for the future of family businesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%