AC 2019
DOI: 10.33960/ac_06pt.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trump dos trópicos? Política externa de ulltradireita no Brasil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As announced in January 2019, the administration of the ultraconservative Jair M. Bolsonaro has engaged in the creation of a new and unprecedented external activism for Brazil. Coined as nationalist and fundamentalist (Casarões, 2020), conservative (Medeiros, Vilas-Boas and Andrade, 2019, March 21), anti-globalist (Rodrigues, 2019), submissive (based on an automatic and unconditional alignment with the state's core ally) (Fuser, 2019), chaotic (Lima and Albuquerque, 2019) or even messianic (Gabatz & Angelin, 2021, p. 123), the foreign policy underwent a process of profound redefinition. Core values and principles which served as guidelines for Brazilian diplomats since the beginning of the 20 th century have been at best questioned and at worst, refuted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As announced in January 2019, the administration of the ultraconservative Jair M. Bolsonaro has engaged in the creation of a new and unprecedented external activism for Brazil. Coined as nationalist and fundamentalist (Casarões, 2020), conservative (Medeiros, Vilas-Boas and Andrade, 2019, March 21), anti-globalist (Rodrigues, 2019), submissive (based on an automatic and unconditional alignment with the state's core ally) (Fuser, 2019), chaotic (Lima and Albuquerque, 2019) or even messianic (Gabatz & Angelin, 2021, p. 123), the foreign policy underwent a process of profound redefinition. Core values and principles which served as guidelines for Brazilian diplomats since the beginning of the 20 th century have been at best questioned and at worst, refuted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He openly favored bolstering the relationship with Trump’s United States. According to Rodrigues (2019: 2), the "affinities between the two are not limited to their ideas, their neo-nationalist tendencies, propensity for post-truth politics (for example, denial of global warming and the military dictatorship in Brazil), and zest for governing via Twitter"; Brazil could well be considered a pivotal state for the far-right movement in Latin America. Shear and Haberman (2019) stress that the White House had the idea that Trump and Bolsonaro could work together to generate a closer connection in terms of trade and regional matters, including the Venezuelan crisis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indagações à parte, é certo que Trump e Bolsonaro conseguiram vencer as eleições que disputaram fazendo uso de estratégias similares no discurso populista e no enfoque comunicacional, por meio das redes sociais e do uso de robotização para disparo de fake news (Ituassu et al, 2019;Iasulaitis & Vieira, 2019). Em outros aspectos, seus governos também apresentaram semelhanças e aproximações, como na ausência de moderação, no alinhamento, nas relações internacionais, que o presidente brasileiro procurou estabelecer com as políticas trumpistas (Rodrigues, 2019;Vidigal, 2019), bem como numa gestão negacionista da pandemia de Covid-19 (Béland et al, 2021;Carvalho et al, 2021;Costa e Bernardi, 2021;Freitas & Negreiros, 2021;Kakisina, 2022;Millikan, 2020). Alguns autores apontam o trumpismo como uma das fontes do populismo reacionário brasileiro, representado pelo atual presidente, junto com o saudosismo do regime militar e um lulismo às avessas como modo de construção da liderança política (Cyril-Lynch & Paschoeto-Cassimiro, 2021).…”
Section: Lista De Tabelasunclassified