1987
DOI: 10.2307/1422643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truly Incidental Encoding of Frequency Information

Abstract: Four experiments demonstrated that adults can reliably remember frequency of occurrence information about items they have been exposed to under truly incidental memory conditions. Subjects neither knew that the ultimate test task would concern item frequency nor that they had any reason to remember the items. This was accomplished by presenting items under the guise of one of three cover tasks: anagram solving, sentence completion, and picture naming in a Stroop-like task. In addition, one experiment found tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such explicit encoding of nonoccurrence for an earlier seen item is unlikely to occur while engaged in the active encoding of different items; This, combined with the likelihood that maintaining a running frequency tally during encoding vastly exceeds working memory capacity, makes it likely that explicit encoding of frequency rarely occurs. This assumption is also consistent with work showing that levels of processing and attentional manipulations that increase or impede explicit recollection have little impact in the encoding of frequency information, which appears largely automatic (Hasher, Zacks, Rose, & Sanft, 1987;Hasher & Zacks, 1984;Zacks, Hasher, & Sanft, 1982;Hasher & Chromiak, 1977). Thus, the JOF task potentially serves as the complement to standard source memory tasks.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Such explicit encoding of nonoccurrence for an earlier seen item is unlikely to occur while engaged in the active encoding of different items; This, combined with the likelihood that maintaining a running frequency tally during encoding vastly exceeds working memory capacity, makes it likely that explicit encoding of frequency rarely occurs. This assumption is also consistent with work showing that levels of processing and attentional manipulations that increase or impede explicit recollection have little impact in the encoding of frequency information, which appears largely automatic (Hasher, Zacks, Rose, & Sanft, 1987;Hasher & Zacks, 1984;Zacks, Hasher, & Sanft, 1982;Hasher & Chromiak, 1977). Thus, the JOF task potentially serves as the complement to standard source memory tasks.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Their only requirement for automatically encoded attributes to enter long-term memory was that the subject must attend to the information either incidentally or intentionally, irrespective of the other resources available to the subject for processing information at the time. Subsequent research on automatic versus effortful processing has focused primarily on the encoding of frequency information (for review, see Hasher & Zacks, 1984;Hasher, Zacks, Rose, & Sanft, 1987). The present data from infants suggest that the encoding of place information is also age-invariant and occurs under conditions that can only be considered truly incidental.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For example, a common finding in dual-process studies is that increasing the "depth" of processing differentially increases recollective-versus familiarity-based responses (e.g., Gardiner, Java, & Richardson-Klavehn, 1996), suggesting that when attention is diverted from conceptual analysis of the materials, recollection suffers more than familiarity (or familiarity is unaffected). Conversely, the registration of information underlying judgments of item exposure frequency appears to be considerably less affected by attentional manipulation (Hasher & Zacks, 1984;Hasher, Zacks, Rose, & Sanft, 1987). To the extent that one assumes such frequency judgments to be predominantly based on item familiarity, this also suggests a differential dependence on attentional resources for recollection and familiarity during encoding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%