2017
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical insect diversity: evidence of greater host specialization in seed‐feeding weevils

Abstract: Host specialization has long been hypothesized to explain the extraordinary diversity of phytophagous insects in the tropics. However, addressing this hypothesis has proved challenging because of the risk of over-looking rare interactions, and hence biasing specialization estimations, and the difficulties to separate the diversity component attributable to insect specialization from that related to host diversity. As a result, the host specialization hypothesis lacks empirical support for important phytophagou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, European oaks belong to the white oaks (section Quercus), while northern red oaks belong to the section Lobatae. This has been observed in some previous studies to be a factor for the specialization of acorn weevils (Peguero et al 2017; but see Bonal et al 2016). Host specialization could, however, differ between native predators, thus conditioning their abilities to exploit alien plant species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, European oaks belong to the white oaks (section Quercus), while northern red oaks belong to the section Lobatae. This has been observed in some previous studies to be a factor for the specialization of acorn weevils (Peguero et al 2017; but see Bonal et al 2016). Host specialization could, however, differ between native predators, thus conditioning their abilities to exploit alien plant species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Weevil pre-dispersal predation shapes recruitment potential of trees (Crawley & Long 1995;Espelta et al 2009;Bogdziewicz et al 2017), and severely destroys crops of northern red oaks in their native range (Lombardo & McCarthy 2008;Bogdziewicz et al 2017). While less is known about moth feeding ecology, weevils are feeding specialists, with particular species best adapted to exploit particular hosts (Bonal et al 2011;Govindan et al 2012;Muñoz et al 2014;Peguero et al 2017). Concerning predation upon red and European white oaks, differences may arise because red oaks acorns have higher tannin concentration, as well as thicker shells than European white oaks (Shimada & Saitoh 2006;Steele 2008; but see Łuczaj et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning other seed features, size is a trait claimed to influence ecomorphological diversification in many endophytic insects (e.g. body size and rostrum shape), promoting differences in their trophic niche, ecological adaptations and species radiation (Hughes & Voegler 2004a;Bonal et al 2011;Peguero et al 2017). In addition to chemical and morphological differences, seeding phenology and stochasticity in the availability of this resource have also been suggested as key factors influencing the guild of insect species predating upon a particular plant host (Espelta et al 2008(Espelta et al , 2009bCoyle et al 2012; see also Pélisson et al 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, for seed-feeding insects a comparison of the genetic structure of their populations and the spatial structure of their potential hosts could provide strong evidence about differences of the trophic niche breadths. Moreover, the use of molecular techniques (DNA barcoding) may help to detect cryptic speciation and trophic niche segregation among morphologically similar species (Peguero et al 2017), and also to establish species specificity in an unequivocal way in comparison to classifications based on the presence or absence of a species on a particular plant, especially when the lack of morphological differences at certain stages (e.g. larvae) make species identification impossible otherwise (Govindan et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation