1989
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(89)90112-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical forest biomass and successional age class relationships to a vegetation index derived from landsat TM data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
100
1
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
100
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used texture filters based on co-occurrence measures by the window size of 11 × 11 pixels with horizontal and vertical offset of one. These metrics have been widely used to predict stand forest structure and biomass from remote sensing data [8,59,63].…”
Section: Landsat Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used texture filters based on co-occurrence measures by the window size of 11 × 11 pixels with horizontal and vertical offset of one. These metrics have been widely used to predict stand forest structure and biomass from remote sensing data [8,59,63].…”
Section: Landsat Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since older and taller regrowth is usually of higher biomass, then infrared canopy re ectance should also be related to stand biomass. While one study has reported a poor relationship between near-infrared re ectance and stand biomass for a series of Puerto Rican regrowth (Sader et al 1989), there are no comparisons of regrowth biomass with respect to middle-infrared re ectance. The research reported in this paper is a test of the potential for estimation of tropical secondary forest above-ground biomass with Landsat TM images using data from a series of stands near Manaus, Brazil and Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(or similar measure of foliar mass) with an accuracy adequate for deriving a predictive relationship (Curran and Williamson, 1985). Despite the logistical problems involved, several groups have managed to produce such relationships (e.g., Jensen and Hodgson, 1985;Running et al, 1986;Badhwar et al, 1986aBadhwar et al, , 1986bDanson, 1987;Spanner et al, 1990;Running et al, 1989;Sader et al, 1989;Herwitz et al, in press;Spanner et al, in review). For instance, Peterson et al (1987) reported a correlation coefficient between LA!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%