2000
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)129<3982:tcksrf>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical Cyclone Kinematic Structure Retrieved from Single-Doppler Radar Observations. Part III: Evolution and Structures of Typhoon Alex (1987)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GBVTD has been successfully applied to several landfalling TC cases (Lee et al, 2000;Harasti et al, 2004;Lee and Bell, 2007; for potential monitoring and warning applications. It has been shown that GBVTD is capable of retrieving horizontal winds of mature TCs with an accuracy of about 2 m s −1 (Harasti et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GBVTD has been successfully applied to several landfalling TC cases (Lee et al, 2000;Harasti et al, 2004;Lee and Bell, 2007; for potential monitoring and warning applications. It has been shown that GBVTD is capable of retrieving horizontal winds of mature TCs with an accuracy of about 2 m s −1 (Harasti et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powell et al (1996) assumed that the RMW in Hurricane Andrew (1992) was an M surface, used Jorgensen's equation to estimate the surface RMW from the flight-level RMW, and in turn used this to estimate the surface winds at landfall. In a Doppler winds study, Lee et al (2000) assumed that the RMW of Typhoon Alex (1987) was an M surface and cited Jorgensen in claiming that the slope of that M surface was a function of both intensity and the RMW, thereby supporting all 3 CWs. Additionally, as noted by Kepert (2006), the RMW slopes outward with height in the boundary layer for entirely different reasons than those that cause its outward slope in the free atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two rainbands formed a 92 nearly closed eyewall at 0600 UTC. The two "moat" regions can be delineated and the eyewalls 93 where the axisymmetric kinematic structure, vorticity, and pressure deficit can be deduced from 102 the GBVTD methodology (Lee et al 1999;2000). The domain of the GBVTD analyses extends 103 from the center of Usagi to 90 km radius and from 1 km to 12 km in the vertical with 1 km grid 104 spacing in both the radial and vertical direction, consistent with the radar sampling resolution.…”
Section: Abstract 23mentioning
confidence: 78%