2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-022-07465-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trolley regulation and swing reduction of underactuated double-pendulum overhead cranes using fuzzy adaptive nonlinear control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusion of (37) means that x(t) will go to infinity when t goes to infinity, which contradicts the result of (32). Therefore, the supposition of y(t) 6 ¼ 0 is invalid, which further makes the following equality hold…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conclusion of (37) means that x(t) will go to infinity when t goes to infinity, which contradicts the result of (32). Therefore, the supposition of y(t) 6 ¼ 0 is invalid, which further makes the following equality hold…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In particular, the passivity-based control is usually used to construct a suitable Lyapunov function for the double-pendulum overhead cranes, however, the energy damping rate only depends on the trolley. 31,32 To enhance the coupling behavior between the trolley and the payload/hook, a new enhanced-coupling-based approach is introduced, 33 where the system dynamic equations need to be linearized when making stability analysis. In addition, some sliding-mode-based nonlinear control approaches are reported to cope with uncertain disturbances in overhead crane systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical AC system [16], uncertainty, such as a change in payload mass, is inevitable. The uncertainty of ACs is characterized by (possibly rapid and irregular) time-varying and unknown bounds [17]. The uncertainty could considerably degrade the performance of the control system if not properly handled [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the open-loop methods, the closed-loop feedback control methods are more robust and more resistant to the unexpected disturbance and therefore are more popular in the research field. Sliding mode control (Nguyen et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2020Zhang et al, , 2021, fuzzy control (Miao et al, 2022;Smoczek, 2014;Tolochko and Bazhutin, 2020), observerbased control (Lu et al, 2017;Ouyang et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2019), passivity-based nonlinear control (Toriumi and Angelico, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022), energy shaping-based control (Chen and Sun, 2020;Sun and Fang, 2012;Wu and He, 2017), and so on are designed and applied on trajectory tracking and anti-swing suppression for crane systems. Some intelligent algorithms such as a neural network-based control method (Abe, 2011;Nemcik et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2020), radial basis function network (RBFN) (Tuan et al, 2018), and genetic algorithm (GA) (Qian et al, 2016) are also included in the theoretical research and practical engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%