2015
DOI: 10.4238/2015.april.22.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

tRNALeu intron (UAA) of Ficus carica L.: genetic diversity and evolutionary patterns

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Cytoplasmic chloroplast DNA was explored to establish genetic relationships among Ficus carica cultivars and elucidate the molecular evolution of the species. The results suggest the occurrence of haplotype and nucleotide diversity. Conserved group I intron sequence motifs were detected and showed a common secondary structure, despite the presence of some mutations on their sequences. The neighbor-joining dendrogram showed a continuous diversity that characterizes local resources. The maximum parsimo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained here are in accordance with other investigations where positive selection acting at the intron sites was revealed or suggested: in the plant Ficus carica [ 123 ], Drosophila melanogaster [ 46 , 47 , 124 ], and primates including humans [ 125 – 129 ]. Nevertheless, the results of the neutrality tests and the interaction between selective and neutral processes should be cautiously interpreted, given the modest sample size of sequences with the relatively short sequence lengths from a single population (e.g., [ 130 , 131 ]).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The data obtained here are in accordance with other investigations where positive selection acting at the intron sites was revealed or suggested: in the plant Ficus carica [ 123 ], Drosophila melanogaster [ 46 , 47 , 124 ], and primates including humans [ 125 – 129 ]. Nevertheless, the results of the neutrality tests and the interaction between selective and neutral processes should be cautiously interpreted, given the modest sample size of sequences with the relatively short sequence lengths from a single population (e.g., [ 130 , 131 ]).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%