2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary divergence in Chenopodium and validation of SNPs in chloroplast rbcL and matk genes by allele-specific PCR for development of Chenopodium quinoa-specific markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we identified 10 proteins and 6 tRNAs with introns in cp genes (Table S3 ). Although intron sequence variation such as transversion, transition, and small InDels (3–10 bp) have been reported in proteins (Cho et al, 2016 ; Devi and Chrungoo, 2017 ), the present study is the first report of the variations in TR copy number in tRNA introns. The changes in highly conserved cp genes have been used to resolve phylogenetic relationships in angiosperm families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In the present study, we identified 10 proteins and 6 tRNAs with introns in cp genes (Table S3 ). Although intron sequence variation such as transversion, transition, and small InDels (3–10 bp) have been reported in proteins (Cho et al, 2016 ; Devi and Chrungoo, 2017 ), the present study is the first report of the variations in TR copy number in tRNA introns. The changes in highly conserved cp genes have been used to resolve phylogenetic relationships in angiosperm families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, in addition to IGS and introns, we identified a number of coding regions that may prove useful for Salvia phylogenetics. The four protein coding genes with highest π values identified by our study (accD, matK, ndhF, and ycf1) have all been used for phylogenetic inference (Zhang and Li 2004;Chang-Li et al 2012;Cruz et al 2013;Qian et al 2013;Luo et al 2014;Patil et al 2015;Srikulnath et al 2015;Uchoi et al 2016;Devi and Chrungoo 2017;Bengtson and Anderberg 2018;Deng et al 2018;Lei et al 2018;Satoh et al 2018;Veranso-Libalah et al 2018), but only matK and ycf1 Sytsma 2011, 2012;Hu et al 2018) have been utilized in sages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The literature on the use of DNA barcoding to explore the phylogeny of Chenopodia has preferentially emphasized the maximal breadth of utility across the entire genus [ 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 ]. This does not necessarily lead to the optimization of the markers for the species of interest here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various members of the Chenopodium species complex are notoriously challenging to identify in the field [ 41 ]. A variety of barcode markers have been suggested for discriminating all members of the genus with DNA sequencing [ 15 , 17 , 18 , 42 , 43 ]. In some practical situations, however, a universal marker is not required; rather, what is needed is a robust assay for distinguishing the species likely to be encountered in a specific region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation