2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01589-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRIPODD: a Novel Fluorescence Imaging Platform for In Situ Quantification of Drug Distribution and Therapeutic Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B-D). The targeted and untargeted behavior of the iPAI probes has been extensively validated in silico, in vitro, and in vivo as previously reported [58,75].…”
Section: Synthesis Of Fluorescently Labeled Erlotinibmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1B-D). The targeted and untargeted behavior of the iPAI probes has been extensively validated in silico, in vitro, and in vivo as previously reported [58,75].…”
Section: Synthesis Of Fluorescently Labeled Erlotinibmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…After image acquisition, a custom MATLAB script (10.5281/zenodo.4004647) was used to calculate ratiometic DTA images on a per pixel basis for each tissue image. DTA, as previously reported [75], was calculated as Drug Target Availability (DTA) =…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Study Of Ipai Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study depicts how protein therapeutics acting at the microscopic scale can further inform its tissue distribution and ultimate response. Finally, our collaborators developed TRIPODD (Therapeutic Response Imaging through Proteomic and Optical Drug Distribution) to evaluate in situ drug target availability with combination of paired-agent imaging and cyclic immunofluorescence [33]. The difference between TRIPODD with PAI presented in this study is that the imaging agents used are cell membrane permeable to achieve intracellular receptor imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] While advances in fluorescence-based tissue histological techniques have enabled the visualization and quantification of target engagement in processed tissue samples, these assays are limited in their ability to simultaneously identify and characterize the phenotypes associated with the cell types present. [3] Furthermore, these approaches require either the introduction of a fluorophore or bioorthogonal handle which may affect the properties of the target molecule. Due to the inherent challenges with multiplexing fluorescence-based microscopy, combining biodistribution with cellular characterization is best suited to Imaging Mass Cytometry™ (IMC™).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%