1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00671-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triplet state Raman spectra of C60 and C70

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From group theory for vibronic coupling, an E 2 g vibration can couple the excited states of e 1 u orbital symmetry in a solvent-distorted C 60 . Independently, Jeoung et al . have attributed new bands arising in the triplet-state Raman spectra of C 60 in toluene solution to symmetry reduction in the electronic excited state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From group theory for vibronic coupling, an E 2 g vibration can couple the excited states of e 1 u orbital symmetry in a solvent-distorted C 60 . Independently, Jeoung et al . have attributed new bands arising in the triplet-state Raman spectra of C 60 in toluene solution to symmetry reduction in the electronic excited state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several electronic transitions which are responsible for the deactivation of photoexcited Ru II porphyrins can be considered: first, the (π,d) transition from the HOMO of the ring to the unfilled metal d orbitals; second, the (d,d) transition between d orbitals of Ru II metal; third, the (d π ,π*(L)) transition from the metal d π electron to the axial ligand; finally, the (d π ,π*(ring)) transition from the metal d π electron to the ring e g (π*). The shift in opposite directions of the ν 4 mode for photoexcited Ru(II) porphyrins compared to photoexcited Cu II porphyrins 6a,b suggests that the excited state of Ru II porphyrins responsible for the observed Raman spectral features is different from the (π,d) or (d,d) state of Cu II porphyrins, which was suggested as the lowest excited state in Cu II porphyrins. 6a, In addition, the ligand-field splitting in Ru II is too large to invoke the (d,d) state 1a,b as an explanation for the excited state Raman spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The weak enhancement of the φ 4 (phenyl) and ν 1 modes suggests that the contribution from the T 1 (π,π*) states of Ru II TPP(L) 2 (L = pyridine and piperidine) to the excited state Raman spectra in Figures c, c, and 4c is negligible, because the strong enhancement of these two modes is characteristic for the porphyrin ring T 1 (π,π*) states of Zn II TPP, H 2 TPP, and Cu II TPP. 6a, Our proposition is in accord with the previous transient absorption measurements 4 in which the proposed lowest excited state of Ru II porphyrins is not the T 1 (π,π*) state but the charge transfer (CT) state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…During spin pumping, the normal Ag(2) mode of C 60 on Py is quenched, with vibrations transferred to duplicates at 1,445–1,460 cm −1 . These modes are associated with the spin triplet or magnetized state of C 60 39 , 40 , and can be observed during surface or tip enhanced spectroscopy 41 , 42 . Estimating the molecular population at each vibrational peak, the red shift comparing the vibrational peak for C 60 on Py off and on resonance during spin pumping translates into an average deceleration of the Ag(2) mode of 0.15 THz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%