1988
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/25/3/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple Point of Pure and Impure Deuterium

Abstract: The liquidus-point behaviour of high-purity and impure D2 has been studied in both normal and equilibrium states. It was found that the liquidus point in the limit of vanishing amount of condensed phase is nearly impurity independent; D2 samples doped with as much as 1% H2 had liquidus points only about 2 mK different from the purest samples available.The temperatures (on the IPTS-68) for the triple points of equilibrium and normal D2 were found to be 18.6963 K and 18.7319 K respectively; the normal boiling po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These problems have now been satisfactorily resolved and the point has been promoted to Table 1. There have been four, more recent, independent determinations of the triple-point temperature [6][7][8][9]202], with the result shown in Table 1. The combined standard uncertainty of the four measurements is 0,3 mK, although the between-set component of the standard deviation is 0,4 mK, indicating that there are probably still some small unresolved systematic uncertainties in at least one of the experiments.…”
Section: The Tables Themselvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems have now been satisfactorily resolved and the point has been promoted to Table 1. There have been four, more recent, independent determinations of the triple-point temperature [6][7][8][9]202], with the result shown in Table 1. The combined standard uncertainty of the four measurements is 0,3 mK, although the between-set component of the standard deviation is 0,4 mK, indicating that there are probably still some small unresolved systematic uncertainties in at least one of the experiments.…”
Section: The Tables Themselvesmentioning
confidence: 99%