2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01408.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple oral fixed-dose diabetes polypill versus insulin plus metformin efficacy demonstration study in the treatment of advanced type 2 diabetes (TrIED study-II)

Abstract: When compared with suboptimally titrated IM there was a trend towards a lower HbA1c with GMP and significantly more GMP subjects obtained an HbA1c under 7%. Global assessments by investigators and subjects showed both a greater efficacy and tolerability with GMP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advancing to triple combination therapy Some studies have shown advantages of adding a third non-insulin agent to a two-drug combination that is not yet or no longer achieving the glycaemic target [83][84][85][86]. Not surprisingly, however, at this juncture, the most robust response will usually be with insulin.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancing to triple combination therapy Some studies have shown advantages of adding a third non-insulin agent to a two-drug combination that is not yet or no longer achieving the glycaemic target [83][84][85][86]. Not surprisingly, however, at this juncture, the most robust response will usually be with insulin.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have shown advantages of adding a third noninsulin agent to a twodrug combination that is not yet or no longer achieving the glycemic target. [83][84][85][86] Not surprisingly, however, at this juncture, the most robust response will usually be with insulin. Indeed, since diabetes is associated with progressive b-cell loss, many patients, especially those with long-standing disease, will eventually need to be transitioned to insulin, which should be favored in circumstances where the degree of hyperglycemia (e.g., ≥ 8.5%) makes it unlikely that another drug will be of sufficient benefit.…”
Section: Position Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roberts VL et al, 2005 found that the addition of glimepride significantly improved the glycemic control as compared to placebo with an acceptable tolerability profile, among patients with type 2 DM not adequately controlled by dual therapy of metformin and thiazolidinedione. 10 The results by Bell DS et al, 2011 show that a fixed dose triple oral diabetes polypill containing glimepride, metformin SR (500 mg) and pioglitazone (15 mg) led to a lower HbA 1c levels as compared to combination of human insulin 70/30 mix and 500 mg metformin among patients with type 2 DM inadequately controlled on combination of glimepride and metformin. 11 In a comparison using historical control, Hsia SH et al, 2011 compared the efficacy of sitagliptin 100 mg daily among patients with poorly controlled type 2 DM while taking maximum tolerated doses of metformin plus sulfonylureas, with historical control group of similar patients treated with rosiglitazone, 8 mg daily, or pioglitazone, 45 mg daily, as their third-line oral agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The results by Bell DS et al, 2011 show that a fixed dose triple oral diabetes polypill containing glimepride, metformin SR (500 mg) and pioglitazone (15 mg) led to a lower HbA 1c levels as compared to combination of human insulin 70/30 mix and 500 mg metformin among patients with type 2 DM inadequately controlled on combination of glimepride and metformin. 11 In a comparison using historical control, Hsia SH et al, 2011 compared the efficacy of sitagliptin 100 mg daily among patients with poorly controlled type 2 DM while taking maximum tolerated doses of metformin plus sulfonylureas, with historical control group of similar patients treated with rosiglitazone, 8 mg daily, or pioglitazone, 45 mg daily, as their third-line oral agent. Although, HbA 1c was reduced in both groups at four months (p < 0.001), the reduction of HbA 1c levels and the percentage of patients who achieved HbA 1c levels < 7.5% was greater with thiazolidinediones than with sitagliptin (p = 0.006 and p = 0.026).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%