2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.843776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated thicknesses were about 5.11, 5.96, and 6.78 cm in the background region and about 4.25, 5. 15,6.02 cm in the iodine insert region for 5-, 6-, and 7-cm breast phantoms, respectively. The difference between thicknesses in the background region and thicknesses in the iodine insert region, which was about 0.8 cm, was caused by iodine inserts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated thicknesses were about 5.11, 5.96, and 6.78 cm in the background region and about 4.25, 5. 15,6.02 cm in the iodine insert region for 5-, 6-, and 7-cm breast phantoms, respectively. The difference between thicknesses in the background region and thicknesses in the iodine insert region, which was about 0.8 cm, was caused by iodine inserts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triple-energy CEDM, which provides a third image, has been considered to overcome the necessity of thickness information. Triple-energy approaches have been suggested for CT, fluoroscopy, and mammography [10][11][12][13][14][15]. To apply tripleenergy method to mammography, three images for three energy bins should be acquired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%