Tribological Aspects of Rolling Bearing Failures

Abstract

Introduction Rolling (element) bearings are referred to as anti-friction bearings due to the low friction and hence only slight energy loss they cause in service, especially compared to sliding or friction bearings. The minor wear occurring in proper operation superficially seems to suggest the question how rolling contact tribology should be of relevance to bearing failures. Satisfactorily proven throughout the 20 th century primarily on small highly loaded ball bearings, the life prediction is actually based on material fatigue theories. Nonetheless, resulting subsurface spalling is usually called fatigue wear and therefore included in the discussion below. The influence of friction on the damage of rolling bearings, at first, is strikingly reflected, for instance, in foreign particle abrasion and smearing adhesion wear under improper running or lubrication conditions. On far less affected, visually intact raceways, however, temporary frictional forces can also initiate failure for common overall friction coefficients below 0.1. Larger size roller bearings with extended line contacts operating typically at low to moderate Hertzian pressure, generally speaking, are most susceptible to this surface loading. As large roller bearings are increasingly applied in the 21 st century, e.g. in industrial gears, an attempt is made in the following to incorporate the rolling-sliding nature of the tribological contact into an extended bearing life model. By holding the established assumption that the stage of crack initiation still dominates the total lifetime, the consideration of the proposed competing normal stress hypothesis is deemed appropriate. The present chapter opens with a general introduction of the subsurface and (near-) surface failure mode of rolling bearings. Due to its particular importance to the identification of the damage mechanisms, the measuring procedure and the evaluation method of the material response analysis, which is based on an X-ray diffraction residual stress determination, are described in detail. In section 4, a metal physics model of classical subsurface rolling contact fatigue is outlined. Recent experimental findings are reported that support this mechanistic approach. The accelerating effect of absorbed hydrogen on rolling contact fatigue is also in agreement with the new model and verified by applying tools of material response analysis. It uncovers a remarkable impact of serious high-frequency electric current passage through bearings in operation, previously unnoticed in the literature. Section 5 provides an overview of state-of-the-art research on mechanical and chemical damage mechanisms by tribological www.intechopen.com Tribology -Lubricants and Lubrication 34 stressing in rolling-sliding contact. The combined action of mixed friction and corrosion in the complex loading regime is demonstrated. Mechanical vibrations in bearing service, e.g. from adjacent machines, increase sliding in the contact area. Typical depth distributions of residual stress and X-ray diffraction peak wid...

Effect of non-metallic inclusions on butterfly wing initiation, crack formation, and spall geometry in bearing steels

“…It should be noted that at this stage the butterfly progression is stopped in the model. This is an assumption consistent with most of the experimental observations that suggest cracks can propagate without further butterfly expansion [49]. However, it should be noted that in few cases it has been observed that butterflies wings keep expanding till final failure as shown in Fig.…”

The Evolution of White Etching Cracks (WECs) in Rolling Contact Fatigue-Tested 100Cr6 Steel

“…The proposed initiation and propagation mechanisms for WSF/WECs are: (1) surface initiation through two opposing mechanisms, (1) shear stress-induced fatigue microcracks [17] and (2) localised high circumferential tensile stress spontaneously induced cleavage-like axial cracks that initiate independently [5,17,18], at defects such as inclusions [17][18][19][20][21] or due to corrosion, machining defects or electrical erosion pits [21]; (2) subsurface initiation by non-metallic inclusions (NMIs) [5][6][7][22][23][24][25][26], perhaps in some cases due to tensile stresses [27]; (3) adiabatic shear banding independent or including defects through impact events, cracks forming after microstructural changes occur [2,28]; (4) self-charging of lubricants triggering localised transient current flow causing local electromagnetic induction that crosses the contact surface leading to electrothermal mechanisms triggering subsequent WEA microstructural change [29,30]; (5) a multistage initiation of WECs as a result of migration of carbon under shear stress and high localised energy [31].…”

Rework solution method on large size radial roller bearings

“…Metallurgical research based on plastic alterations detected in subsurface material by transmission electron microscopic investigation gives indications that the subsurface depth at which significant amounts of material alteration occur is approximately 0.75b [18]. In summary, the region or zone of maximum shearing stresses can be defined as the stressed volume beneath the Hertzian contact ranging from 0.50 to 0.79b depth below the stressed surface.…”