1980
DOI: 10.1017/s0021932000006118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends of Isonymy and Inbreeding Among the Ahmadiyyas of Kashmir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the societies the surnames are polyphyletic, and this violates one of the assumptions of surname analysis. The complexity of caste structure poses serious problems for the application of isonymy analysis to population structure studies (Kashyap 1980). Whereas, some tribal societies are not belong to the same structure as a Hindu urban population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, in the societies the surnames are polyphyletic, and this violates one of the assumptions of surname analysis. The complexity of caste structure poses serious problems for the application of isonymy analysis to population structure studies (Kashyap 1980). Whereas, some tribal societies are not belong to the same structure as a Hindu urban population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Indian context there has been a debate over the application of surnames for the study of inbreeding and genetic kinship. This debate is based on the premise that some of the assumptions of the isonymy method are not satisfied, especially among several castes (jati) and subcastes (Kashyap and Tiwari 1980;Kashyap 1980). However, there are several communities (e.g., tribes, some caste groups, and small isolated communities) where isonymy methods can be applied to infer population structure and genetic kinship (Kashyap 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations