2018
DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2018.61.8.466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in the of epidemiological perspectives on the causality of occupational diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PC is not a cut-off or absolute value. However, the PC should be interpreted in both medical and legal ways [ 18 46 55 ]. How to use and apply these PCs should be discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PC is not a cut-off or absolute value. However, the PC should be interpreted in both medical and legal ways [ 18 46 55 ]. How to use and apply these PCs should be discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MA of 34 studies conducted in 2011, the RRs of shift work for myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke were 1.23 (95% CI: 1.15–1.31) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01–1.09) [ 56 ]. Epidemiological evidence did not have a high enough PC, however, considering other social contexts in South Korea, the presumption of disease was applied when exposure to long working hours was confirmed [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation