“…Spillover, which is the net export of adult fish from a no-take area (Abesamis and Russ, 2005), implies that fishes will move from a no-take area where there is a high concentration of individuals, to areas where fishing has reduced the number and size of fish (Kramer and Chapman, 1999;Kerwath et al, 2013). While there may be some true density-dependent spillover of D. petersi from the no-take zones into the adjacent exploited zones within the iSimangaliso MPA, the remoteness of many of the areas and the low fishing effort adjacent to the no-take zones, especially since the implementation of the beach vehicle ban in 2002 (Mann et al, 2016a;Mann and Mann-Lang, 2020), has likely reduced the gradient in fish density between the zones (Mann et al, 2016a), with the result that much of the dispersal observed in this study is more likely to have been as a consequence of variability in individual movement patterns. This observation is supported by the fact that ranging movements were undertaken by 4 fish tagged in an exploited zone, 1 of which moved into a no-take zone and the other 3 swam right through a no-take zone and were recaptured in an exploited zone on the other side (Table 1).…”