2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005gl024995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in precipitation and streamflow in the eastern U.S.: Paradox or perception?

Abstract: Many studies have reported that total precipitation is increasing across the United States with most of the increase resulting from a positive trend in the upper tail of the daily precipitation distribution. Other studies have found that low and moderate, but not high flows are also increasing across much of the United States. How can precipitation, especially that produced by intense events, increase without a corresponding increase in high flows? We analyzed trends in annual 7‐day low, average and high flows… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
135
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(20 reference statements)
10
135
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to binomial test, the quantile-quantile plot (qq plot) of the uniform distribution of signs is also presented in Figure 8. Departures from the uniform distribution indicate that the null hypothesis of no trend must be rejected (Small et al, 2006). It is clear that the AMDSL and ANDSP do not deviate from linearity, but the departure is clearly larger for ANDSP.…”
Section: Test For Regional Trendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to binomial test, the quantile-quantile plot (qq plot) of the uniform distribution of signs is also presented in Figure 8. Departures from the uniform distribution indicate that the null hypothesis of no trend must be rejected (Small et al, 2006). It is clear that the AMDSL and ANDSP do not deviate from linearity, but the departure is clearly larger for ANDSP.…”
Section: Test For Regional Trendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lins and Slack 1999, McCabe and Wolock 2002, Krakauer and Fung 2008 and regional (e.g. Regonda et al 2004, Small et al 2006, Brutsaert 2010) scales, as well as international ones (e.g. Stewart et al 2005, Hodgkins andDudley 2006).…”
Section: United States Reference Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lettenmaier et al, 1994;Rose, 1. Introduction 2009;Lins and Slack , 1999;Small et al, 2006;Regonda et al, 2005;Khaliq et al, 2008].…”
Section: Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krakauer and Fung, 2008;Small et al, 2006;Tootle and Piechota, 2006] and large scale atmospheric circulation patterns [e.g. Barlow et al, 2001;Rajagopalan et al, 2000;Tootle and Piechota, 2006;Tootle et al, 2005].…”
Section: Principles Of Large-scale Hydrological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%