2014
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Maternal Morbidity Before and During Pregnancy in California

Abstract: The prevalence of maternal comorbidities before and during pregnancy has risen substantially in California and demonstrates racial/ethnic disparity independent of demographic shifts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some behavioural factors that were investigated, i.e. drug abuse and eating disorder, have been shown to be poorly recorded and thus could have been underreported in this study. In addition, we were limited to investigating BMI derived from self‐reported weight and height information, which has shown previously to relate to biased risk estimates of PTB .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some behavioural factors that were investigated, i.e. drug abuse and eating disorder, have been shown to be poorly recorded and thus could have been underreported in this study. In addition, we were limited to investigating BMI derived from self‐reported weight and height information, which has shown previously to relate to biased risk estimates of PTB .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Potential confounders were selected based on their significance in the univariable analysis ( P < 0.1) and because they have been associated with increased risk for PTB. The potential confounders included in the multivariable model were maternal age (continuous), prenatal care initiation (during first 5 months, 6 months or later/no initiation/unknown), maternal education (some high school or less, high school graduate, some college, college graduate or more), race/ethnicity (Non‐Hispanic White, Non‐Hispanic Black, Asian, Hispanic, Other), parity (nulliparous, multiparous), smoking during pregnancy (yes, no), presence of eating disorder (yes/no), anaemia (yes/no), pre‐existing diabetes (yes/no), pre‐existing hypertension (yes/no), gestational diabetes (yes/no), gestational hypertension (yes/no), placental abruption (yes/no), and maternal height (continuous) to reduce further potential residual confounding associated with the BMI algorithm . Because risk‐adjusted PTB could result from medical intervention, we compared the relation between severity of underweight and PTB in births that were spontaneous and in births that resulted from medical intervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14 Relevant maternal comorbidities, pregnancy complications, deliveryrelated procedures, and intrapartum complications were identified using the diagnosis and procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), listed in Appendix A. Comorbidities and complications were classified using previously described algorithms for identifying reliable pregnancy-related data using ICD-9 codes. [15][16][17] Available maternal characteristics included for comparison were age, race/ethnicity, primary insurance payer, median household income (in quartiles based on a patient's postal code), and maternal comorbidities. Pregnancy characteristics included multiple gestation, prior cesarean delivery, presence of preterm labor, and placental previa (encompassing all abnormal placentations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 This data set has been used broadly to track maternal/child health outcomes and to assess the quality of obstetric care. 15, 16 The database includes patient discharge data (including diagnosis and procedure codes) for antepartum admissions in the 9 months prior to delivery, and linked maternal/infant admissions in the year after delivery, as well as data from the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth. Details of data linkage and quality control are described in detail elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%