1997
DOI: 10.1109/101.589261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in DRAM dielectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparable leakage current for the ON and N2ONO dielectrics indicates that the inverse growth sequence of the oxide and nitride is a potential candidate as the DRAM storage dielectric. In fact, the storage dielectric was evolved from the initial ONO (oxide/nitride/oxide) to the current NO due to the required thinner equivalent oxide thickness to maintain the cell capacitance [14], with a low-pressure oxidation and appropriate treatment to enhance the nitride quality, the reliable ON structure becomes possible. Since there existed a 0.26-nm physical-oxide-thickness difference between the NO and the ON dielectric, the cell capacitance of the NO dielectric will be necessarily augmented by reducing the oxide thickness to the same level with that of the ON dielectric.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparable leakage current for the ON and N2ONO dielectrics indicates that the inverse growth sequence of the oxide and nitride is a potential candidate as the DRAM storage dielectric. In fact, the storage dielectric was evolved from the initial ONO (oxide/nitride/oxide) to the current NO due to the required thinner equivalent oxide thickness to maintain the cell capacitance [14], with a low-pressure oxidation and appropriate treatment to enhance the nitride quality, the reliable ON structure becomes possible. Since there existed a 0.26-nm physical-oxide-thickness difference between the NO and the ON dielectric, the cell capacitance of the NO dielectric will be necessarily augmented by reducing the oxide thickness to the same level with that of the ON dielectric.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Consequently alternative materials with dielectric constants higher than silicon dioxide are currently widely investigated. 4,5 However, differences in bonding between many of these materials and silicon result in interfaces of poor quality, with high densities of interfacial defects that alter electrical properties. 6 For this reason it is believed that an ultrathin ͑Ͻ1 nm͒ buffer layer will generally be needed at the interface between Si and high-k materials to ensure reliability and performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier capacitor structures were based on Si 3 N 4 (dielectric constant ε r = 7) and SiO 2 (ε r = 3.9) such as ONO (oxide-nitride-oxide) and ON (oxide-nitride) capacitor structures [1]- [2]. Earlier capacitor structures were based on Si 3 N 4 (dielectric constant ε r = 7) and SiO 2 (ε r = 3.9) such as ONO (oxide-nitride-oxide) and ON (oxide-nitride) capacitor structures [1]- [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier capacitor structures were based on Si 3 N 4 (dielectric constant ε r = 7) and SiO 2 (ε r = 3.9) such as ONO (oxide-nitride-oxide) and ON (oxide-nitride) capacitor structures [1]- [2]. It was predicted that, after tantalum oxide, ferroelectric materials such as SrTiO 3 (ε r = 200) or Ba x Sr 1-x TiO 3 (ε r = 400) may be necessary [2]. It was predicted that, after tantalum oxide, ferroelectric materials such as SrTiO 3 (ε r = 200) or Ba x Sr 1-x TiO 3 (ε r = 400) may be necessary [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%