2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-013-0767-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree microhabitats at the stand scale in montane beech–fir forests: practical information for taxa conservation in forestry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Forests managed with the selection system emulate OGFs with regard to some structural characteristics of living trees [38][39][40]; thus, the selection system has features of multifunctional and close-to-nature forest management in the given context. Nevertheless, studies on how this system specifically affects deadwood presence and structure are rare (e.g., [48,49]). Paletto et al [37] showed that multifunctional management yielded larger quantities of deadwood than intense production-oriented management.…”
Section: Deadwood Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forests managed with the selection system emulate OGFs with regard to some structural characteristics of living trees [38][39][40]; thus, the selection system has features of multifunctional and close-to-nature forest management in the given context. Nevertheless, studies on how this system specifically affects deadwood presence and structure are rare (e.g., [48,49]). Paletto et al [37] showed that multifunctional management yielded larger quantities of deadwood than intense production-oriented management.…”
Section: Deadwood Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Larrieu & Cabanettes ; Larrieu et al . ). However, these results do not give direct indications on the rate of TreM formation on trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Oldeman (1990) identifies four phases forming the sylvatic mosaic: (i) innovation, (ii) aggradation, (iii) biostatic, and (iv) degradation. Likewise, Larrieu et al (2014a) compared data from 32 unharvested European mountain mixed forests, and experimentally identified five forest development phases (FDPs): (i) regeneration, (ii) establishing, (iii) growing, (iv) culmination, and (v) disintegration. Hence, the forest is a mosaic of patches, characterized by their evolution and maturity (Schnitzler & Closset 2003): this dynamics in space and time contribute to the development of a heterogeneous environment, characterized by multiple functional cycles (i.e., silvigenic, humus, pedofauna - Arpin et al 1998).…”
Section: Translating Old-growth Forest Features Into Management Princmentioning
confidence: 99%