2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree cavities in forests – The broad distribution pattern of a keystone structure for biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
131
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
131
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many studies are available on this ecological resource, it is only well documented and reviewed in Australia, Europe, and North America (Goldingay, 2009;Remm and Lohmus, 2011). Cockle et al (2011) and Remm and Lohmus (2011) analysed biotic and abiotic factors contributing to the distribution, creation, and formation of tree cavities on the world scale. None of the studies referred to in these reviews originate from the 8 member countries (including Pakistan) of the Hindu-Kush Himalayan region, which cover ranges of tropical deciduous forests (Himalayan foothills) and moist and dry temperate Himalayan forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although many studies are available on this ecological resource, it is only well documented and reviewed in Australia, Europe, and North America (Goldingay, 2009;Remm and Lohmus, 2011). Cockle et al (2011) and Remm and Lohmus (2011) analysed biotic and abiotic factors contributing to the distribution, creation, and formation of tree cavities on the world scale. None of the studies referred to in these reviews originate from the 8 member countries (including Pakistan) of the Hindu-Kush Himalayan region, which cover ranges of tropical deciduous forests (Himalayan foothills) and moist and dry temperate Himalayan forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported 963 tree cavities/ha in a southern temperate mixed beech forest of New Zealand. This was rated the maximum of 133 study sites reviewed by Remm and Lohmus (2011), who estimated the global median density of cavities to be 16/ ha, with densities highest in Australasia and lowest in the Palaearctic region. This comparison suggests that the tree cavity density of our study site is markedly higher than the global average density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, people essentially create new bluebird habitat when they set up "nest box trails." While the distribution of natural nest cavities in post-fire forest is often highly variable, nest boxes in these human-modified suburban and agricultural landscapes are often distributed evenly in a grid or linear transect (Lehmkuhl et al, 2003;Remm and Lõhmus, 2011;Duckworth, 2014). Moreover, in post-fire forests, nest cavity quality is highly variable depending on how it was created (e.g., by rot or various woodpecker species; (Robles and Martin, 2013); whereas, in human-created nest box trails, nest boxes are typically the same shape, size, and thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a smaller number of oak standards that had some small cavities compared to ash standards, and also their number per tree was lower in oak. The lower number of small cavities in oak could potentially be related to its wood hardness and increased difficulty in excavating these cavities (Schepps et al 1999;Lorenz et al 2015), although the wood hardness was usually found to play a significant role only within the same tree species (Remm, Lõhmus 2011). The difference between the oak and ash standards highlights the importance of maintaining veteran trees of multiple species in hardwood floodplain forests, as they vary in their ability to provide different aspects of wildlife microhabitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%