2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree and stand light use efficiencies over a full rotation of single- and mixed-species Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Stand 2 differs from the others in that it was examined for a whole rotation period, which spanned the age of 1 to 6 years. During this time the mean tree heights were between 2.5 to 24.4 m and the stand L increased to its peak at about age 3 years before stabilizing and finally declining towards the end of the rotation (le Maire et al 2013). During this rotation period there may be significant changes in leaf display, however, there was no clear relationship between age and k H for either species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Stand 2 differs from the others in that it was examined for a whole rotation period, which spanned the age of 1 to 6 years. During this time the mean tree heights were between 2.5 to 24.4 m and the stand L increased to its peak at about age 3 years before stabilizing and finally declining towards the end of the rotation (le Maire et al 2013). During this rotation period there may be significant changes in leaf display, however, there was no clear relationship between age and k H for either species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Maestra was also tested in an experiment containing monocultures and mixtures of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium (Stand 2 in Table 1; le Maire et al 2013). Gap fractions were slightly overestimated by Maestra in the monocultures and underestimated in the mixtures, which resulted in underestimates of APAR of 3.4% for A. mangium monocultures, 4.5% for E. grandis monocultures and overestimates of 4.6% for 1:1 mixtures.…”
Section: Description Of Detailed Tree-level Light Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple allometric relationships calibrated for different ages and for different plots are needed for tree-scale PBMs. Some previous studies of light use with the MAESTRA or MAESPA model assumed a nominal position for trees within the stands (Christina et al 2015;le Maire et al 2013), while others estimated the tree position using in situ measurements, aerial photography, or very high resolution satellite images (Charbonnier et al 2013;Forrester et al 2013b;Gspaltl et al 2013). The assumption of a regular spacing could bias Fig.…”
Section: Tree-scale Parameter Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was always associated with more stratified canopies (Binkley et al, 1992;Forrester et al, 2012;le Maire et al, 2013;Menalled et al, 1998;Nouvellon et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%