1969
DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v39n20p569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree and fruit characters ofCitrustriploids from tetraploid by diploid crosses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Five different crosses, each consisting of 6 sister triploid hybrids and their parents (Soost and Cameron, 1969) were used in the study. Crosses 1 and 2 each had a tetraploid Citrus paradisi Mad.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five different crosses, each consisting of 6 sister triploid hybrids and their parents (Soost and Cameron, 1969) were used in the study. Crosses 1 and 2 each had a tetraploid Citrus paradisi Mad.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citrus autotetraploids have been less vigorous and productive and fruit quality has been less desirable than diploid progenitors (Soost and Cameron, 1969), but some triploid hybrids have been developed that are reasonably vigorous and productive (Soost andCameron, 1980, 1985). The interest in triploids arises from their potential to pro-duce seedless fruit (Soost and Cameron, 1969), a commercially significant attribute. Triploid citrus plants have been recovered after endosperm culture in vitro ; however, the frequency of plant recovery via this route and the vigor of recovered plants have been unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Manipulating Ploidy Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the breeding methods for developing seedless cultivars (SpiegelRoy, 1988) are the production of triploid hybrid seedlings (Soost and Cameron, 1969) and creating mutants by irradiation (Hearn, 1986). While cross breeding to develop diploid seedless cutlivars, we found a close relationship in seediness between hybrid progenies and parents; seedless or few seeded parents frequently produced seedless offsprings, whereas seedy or very seedy parents produced very few seedless offsprings (Yamamoto et al, 1992b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%