2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00089-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment system for solid matrix contaminated with fluoranthene. I––Modified extraction technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the 3:1 mixture of cyclohexane and ethanol has high extraction efficiency of more than 93%. 53…”
Section: Soil Washing With Water and Organic Solventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the 3:1 mixture of cyclohexane and ethanol has high extraction efficiency of more than 93%. 53…”
Section: Soil Washing With Water and Organic Solventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of organic solvents including cyclohexane and ethanol mixture (3:1), dichloromethane, ethanol, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimethylformamide, N-butyl acetate, N-propyl acetate and toluene have also been considered in a soil remediation study aiming at extraction of fluoranthene from contaminated soil [14]. The 3:1 mixture of cyclohexane and ethanol was found to be the most suitable solvent due to its high extraction efficiency of approximately 93% and from the point of safety.…”
Section: Soil Washing With Water and Organic Solventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TPH level in the extracted solution is can be determined by several methods such as gravimetric or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) measurement calibrated by an EPA calibration standard. A series of experimental tests were conducted by Rababah and Matsuzawa [5], Khodadoust et al [6]; Silva et al [7], Li et al [8], at laboratory environment for a range of solvents with various ratios and different time to enhance the extraction process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was revealed that a ratio of 1:8 was required to achieve the most efficient removal process. However, Rababah and Matsuzawa [5] discovered that the most efficient solvent was cyclohexane and ethanol mixture at a ratio of 3:1, with excellent removal efficiency of around 93% as well as from the safety aspect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%