1978
DOI: 10.1378/chest.74.2.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Pulmonary Melioidosis with Combination of Trimethoprim and Sulfamethoxazole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to other reported antibiograms (10,18). Although tetracycline or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been suggested as primary therapy for melioidosis, no satisfactory treatment regimens have been established (15). P. pseudomallei is not only resistant to therapy with many antibiotics but clinically may fail to respond to those drugs to which it is susceptible in vitro (13,26).…”
Section: Onpgsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results are similar to other reported antibiograms (10,18). Although tetracycline or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been suggested as primary therapy for melioidosis, no satisfactory treatment regimens have been established (15). P. pseudomallei is not only resistant to therapy with many antibiotics but clinically may fail to respond to those drugs to which it is susceptible in vitro (13,26).…”
Section: Onpgsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Possibly the first such case was described in 1948 66, and several subsequent reports have suggested that infection was probably contracted in the Philippines (55,73,74,94,126,169), although in individuals who have travelled extensively within endemic areas it is often impossible to be certain as to the origin of infection.…”
Section: History and Geographical Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is known of the prevalence of melioidosis in the Philippine Islands, although reports of exported cases suggest that the organism must exist there. Possibly the first such case was described in 1948 (66), and several subsequent reports have suggested that infection was probably contracted in the Philippines (55,73,74,94,126,169), although in individuals who have travelled extensively within endemic areas it is often impossible to be certain as to the origin of infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%