Treatment of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder in Home and Community Settings

Schoenwald, Sonja K.; Henggeler, Scott W.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4881-2_22

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…MST has produced favorable results for treating mid-to-late age adolescent youth who engage in antisocial behaviors and externalize their problems (Schoenwald and Henggeler, 1999). The goal of this approach is to alter systems such as family, school, peers, and community that foster antisocial behaviors.…”

Section: Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chronic Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Goldstein

Morewitz

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chronic Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Goldstein

Morewitz

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Diese Verbesserungen konnten zumindest in einer Untersuchung auch längerfristig (zweieinhalb und fünf Jahre nach der Therapie) bestätigt werden [25]. Diese günstigen Befunde wurden jedoch vornehmlich in kleinen quasi-experimentellen Studien mit zum Teil hohen Ausfallraten erzielt, so dass eine empirische Fundierung der Behandlung gerade von schwer kriminellen Jugendlichen und ihren Familien noch nicht zufrieden stellend erfolgt ist [55].…”

Section: Konfrontative Pädagogikunclassified

Jugenddelinquenz - Aktuelle Präventions - und Interventionskonzepte

Beelmann

2008

Forens Psychiatr Psychol Krimino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…MST has been demonstrated not only to be effective in reducing antisocial behavior (Borduin, 1999;Schoenwald and Henggeler, 1999), but also to be highly cost-effective (Aos et al, 2001). MST adopts a proactive and flexible focus in addressing risks at the individual, family, peer, school, and neighborhood level.…”

Section: Multimodal Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder

Burke¹,

Loeber²,

Birmaher³

2004

FOC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the second of two parts of a review of the key research findings from the past 10 years on oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD), referred to here as disruptive behavior disorders (DBD). In part I, we reviewed evidence regarding the features and diagnostic subclassifications of DBD, distinctions between ODD and CD, epidemiological findings, and comorbidity with other disorders. Since the relationship between DBD and other psychopathology was reviewed in part I, we have not included other psychopathology as risk factors in this article. Interested readers are referred to part I of this review (Loeber et al., 2000).In part II of this article, we focus on developmental models of DBD, as well as on their risk fac-tors and correlates, such as neurological and biological processes and psychosocial factors. We also review research on the effectiveness of treatment for DBD and make recommendations for future research and practice. SCOPE OF THE SELECTED RESEARCHOur intention was to consider research on the diagnoses of ODD and CD. However, many worthwhile studies have examined overlapping constructs. Therefore, where relevant, we include studies of risk factors for delinquency and violence, realizing that such constructs are not identical with DBD. The similarities they share with DBD suggest that risk factors for delinquency and violence

show abstract

Treatment of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder in Home and Community Settings

Cited by 8 publications

References 68 publications

Chronic Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Chronic Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Jugenddelinquenz - Aktuelle Präventions - und Interventionskonzepte

Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About