1991
DOI: 10.1128/aac.35.9.1721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of murine cryptococcal meningitis with an SCH 39304-amphotericin B combination

Abstract: Cryptococcal meningitis was induced in BALB/c mice by intracerebral infection with Cryptococcus neoformans. Drug therapy was initiated 1 day later, with mice receiving amphotericin B (AMB), SCH 39304, combination therapy, or no drug therapy (controls). Most, but not all, combinations showed additive benefits, significantly prolonging survival and reducing organism counts in tissues compared with those in controls and groups which received the drugs independently. Optimum protection was obtained when a single d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of FLC-AMB antagonism was observed in murine candidiasis studies (17,21) and by George et al (8) in an immunosuppressed rabbit model of aspergillosis, by Anaissie et al (2) against Trichosporon beigelii infection in mice, and by Barchiesi et al (5) against murine systemic cryptococcosis. Other triazole-AMB combinations were also not antagonistic, including saperconazole against murine systemic candidiasis (20) and SCH 39304 against murine systemic candidiasis (19) and cryptococcal meningitis (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of FLC-AMB antagonism was observed in murine candidiasis studies (17,21) and by George et al (8) in an immunosuppressed rabbit model of aspergillosis, by Anaissie et al (2) against Trichosporon beigelii infection in mice, and by Barchiesi et al (5) against murine systemic cryptococcosis. Other triazole-AMB combinations were also not antagonistic, including saperconazole against murine systemic candidiasis (20) and SCH 39304 against murine systemic candidiasis (19) and cryptococcal meningitis (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations that have not confirmed synergy (78,80,161) VOL. 48,2004 MINIREVIEW 697 (14) Improved (3,50,61,157), similar (14,50,60,212), or worse (89) survival Reduced tissue burden (50,78,101,212) Combination associated with better survival than monotherapy and was consistent over a range of doses (3); effects more pronounced at lower doses (101), and single agents were very effective at higher doses alone; 5FC ϩ KTC rarely cleared tissues better than either agent alone (150); hamsters with combination did worse than with ITC alone (89); ITC ϩ 5FC performed similarly to ITC ϩ AmB and better than ITC or 5FC monotherapy in guinea pigs (212); with 10 days of treatment of mice, combination prolonged survival more than either agent alone but not when treatment was limited to 5 days (157); PSC combination not better than monotherapy in terms of survival but better than monotherapy in reducing fungal counts in brain tissue (14) Humans FLC (48,102,124,193,223) Good clinical success (48,102,193 FLC: addition of AmB to FLC had dramatic impact on yeast burden in brain tissue b , but survival with AmB was 100%; effects on survival were greatest at highest dosages of azole-AMB (2,158); improved survival at lower doses of ITC ϩ AmB, but survival was worse when higher doses were used (157); FLU preexposure did not reduce subsequent AmB activity (13) Humans-case report (47) Case report of a woman with meningitis who responded to this combination after failing AmB used lower concentrations of flucytosine and amphotericin B only or used strains with reduced susceptibility to flucytosine, which may have influenced or biased their ability to characterize the full spe...…”
Section: Neoformans (I) In Vitro Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of amphotericin B (AmB) and azole antifungal drugs in the treatment of fungal infections is still a controversial issue (1,9,11,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). AmB is believed to act primarily by damaging the fungal cell membrane after binding to fungal sterols, mainly to ergosterol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%