The MICs and fractional inhibitory concentrations of posaconazole (POS) and voriconazole (VRZ), alone and in combination with amphotericin B (AMB), for the conidia and hyphae of 100 Aspergillus isolates were evaluated. POS-AMB had more synergistic activity against hyphae (75% of isolates) than VRZ-AMB (37%) and significantly more synergistic activity against hyphae than against conidia (12%).Filamentous fungal pathogens are recognized as major and increasing sources of infection in immunocompromised hosts (6,18). The most common species causing disease in patients is Aspergillus fumigatus (90%), followed by Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus terreus (6,8). In the meantime, besides amphotericin B (AMB), several other drugs are available as treatments for invasive aspergillosis, such as voriconazole (VRZ), posaconazole (POS), and caspofungin (1,9,23,24). POS was recently approved for use for the treatment of patients with invasive infections that are refractory to other antifungal agents (17). The high rate of mortality from mold infections and the relatively limited efficacies of the current agents have produced a significant interest in the use of polyene-and azole-based combinations for these difficult-to-treat infections (3,5,11,19). The present study evaluated the antifungal activity of either POS or VRZ, alone and in combination with AMB, against the conidia and hyphae of Aspergillus spp. in vitro.We tested 25 clinical isolates each of A. fumigatus, A. terreus, A. flavus, and A. niger from patients with invasive aspergillosis. The MICs of AMB (Sigma Aldrich, Vienna, Austria), VRZ (kindly provided by Pfizer, Vienna, Austria), and POS (kindly provided by Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ) for Aspergillus spp. were tested according to the guidelines described in the CLSI (formerly the NCCLS) M38-A document (15). The MICs for hyphae were tested by the method of . For all drugs the endpoints were read at 100% inhibition of conidia germination and hyphal growth after 48 h of incubation at 35°C. The endpoints read at 80% resulted in similar MIC data (not shown). Drug combinations were assessed by a checkerboard method. The synergy tests were evaluated by using the MIC endpoints of each drug. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) of each drug for an individual isolate was calculated as the ratio of the concentration of the drug in combination that achieves the MIC endpoint to the MIC of the drug alone obtained by use of that endpoint. FIC index values were interpreted as follows: FIC Յ0.5, synergistic; FIC Ն1 to Յ4, indifferent; and FIC Ͼ4, antagonistic (3). Also, the metabolic activity of drug-treated hyphae was determined by their ability to reduce the tetrazolium compound 3-(4,5-dimethl-2-thiazol)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), as described elsewhere (13). Duplicate testing was performed on separate days. The results of the in vitro tests were compared by the log-rank test. Significance was defined as a P value of Ͻ0.05.The MIC ranges for conidia and hyphae...