2010
DOI: 10.1159/000313532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Metachronous and Simultaneous Liver Metastases of Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: Aim: Patients were analyzed who underwent treatment of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. Methods: Selection criteria were the possibility of R0 resection of the primary and/or the liver metastases, no other sites of metastases, and the presentation of liver metastases. A comparison of treatment by surgery versus chemotherapy regarding overall survival and disease-free interval was performed. Results: Between 1996 and 2008, a total number of 23 patients were retrospectively identified from a prospective … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
81
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference in survival in patients with synchronous liver metastases of PDAC treated by resection of the primary tumor combined with liver resection versus treatment by gemcitabine (8 vs. 11 months). In patients with metachronous liver metastases, the median survival was increased after metastasectomy compared to patients who were treated with gemcitabine only (31 vs. 11 months, respectively) [39].…”
Section: Role Of Surgerymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was no difference in survival in patients with synchronous liver metastases of PDAC treated by resection of the primary tumor combined with liver resection versus treatment by gemcitabine (8 vs. 11 months). In patients with metachronous liver metastases, the median survival was increased after metastasectomy compared to patients who were treated with gemcitabine only (31 vs. 11 months, respectively) [39].…”
Section: Role Of Surgerymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ideally, this decision is based on a highly individual basis, including the patient's wishes, age, clinical status, local resectability, and the individual risk of complications. However, published data demonstrate that the procedure can be performed safely, but results are inconsistent as to whether complete resection of the PDAC with combined resection of liver metastases will lead to a survival benefit [30,[38][39][40][41][42][43]. Eight reports including more than 9 patients found median overall survival times between 5.9 and 11.4 months after resection [29,39,42,[44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Role Of Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the advances in cancer immunology and improvement in surgical as well as non-surgical therapeutic approaches in patients with metastases [14], the overall 5-year survival rate of 5% has not changed significantly [3]. Hence, models that resemble the human situation in pancreatic cancer are required to study the underlying causes of immunosuppression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From all options currently available for pancreatic cancer patients, surgical resection offers the only potential cure. Patients undergoing pancreatic resection have a 5-year survival rate of 5–15%, with a median survival of 13–17 months [1,2,3,4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%