1982
DOI: 10.1002/ep.670010315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of heavy metals in wastewaters. What wastewater‐treatment method is most cost‐effective for electroplating and finishing operations? Here are the alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well‐known that copper accumulation in muscles, human brain, skin, liver, pancreas, and heart causes Wilson’s disease2 and this is why different copper removal methods are currently applied. These methods can be classified as chemical precipitation, ion exchange, evaporation, cementation, electrolysis, and reverse osmosis 3…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well‐known that copper accumulation in muscles, human brain, skin, liver, pancreas, and heart causes Wilson’s disease2 and this is why different copper removal methods are currently applied. These methods can be classified as chemical precipitation, ion exchange, evaporation, cementation, electrolysis, and reverse osmosis 3…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing heavy metal ions from water in water treatment has attracted much interest on environment and health. Conventional methods that have been employed to remove heavy metal ions from waster solution usually include chemical precipitation, ion exchange, evaporation, membrane separation, and cementation electrolysis, etc 1–4. However, these treatment methods sometimes do not provide satisfactory removal rates to meet the pollution control limits or are usually expensive 5, 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical remedial processes such as ion exchange, reverse osmosis, microfiltration, precipitation, or flocculation are widely used to remove heavy metals from aqueous streams. 48 These methods, however, may be ineffective for large water volumes and low metal ion concentrations. 12 In stream waters, U is usually complexed with a ligand, such as carbonate, hydroxide, sulfate, phosphate, fluoride and possibly silicate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%