2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb12533.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of fractures of the mandible and maxilla by mini titanium plate fixation systems in dogs and catsa

Abstract: Mini titanium plates were used to repair certain fractures of the maxilla and mandible in dogs and cats, under general anaesthesia. The location of the fractures treated were: corpus mandible, one dog; corpus mandible and symphysis, two dogs; caudal mandible, two dogs; rostral mandible, one dog; maxilla, one dog; nasal bone, one dog; corpus mandible and symphysis, one cat; caudal mandible, one cat; and maxilla, one cat. The healing periods varied from 6 to 9 weeks. In seven cases, implants were removed after a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The median peak loads withstood by the locking (38 N) and nonlocking (24 N) constructs of the present study were significantly less than the maximum bite force recorded for cats; however, in vitro testing of the constructs required stripping of all supporting soft tissues and removal of stabilization provided by the contralateral mandible through the mandibular symphysis. The findings of the present study were consistent with those of 2 case-series reports 11,12 in which use of miniplates for internal fixation of mandibular fractures in cats resulted in successful return to function for all cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 The median peak loads withstood by the locking (38 N) and nonlocking (24 N) constructs of the present study were significantly less than the maximum bite force recorded for cats; however, in vitro testing of the constructs required stripping of all supporting soft tissues and removal of stabilization provided by the contralateral mandible through the mandibular symphysis. The findings of the present study were consistent with those of 2 case-series reports 11,12 in which use of miniplates for internal fixation of mandibular fractures in cats resulted in successful return to function for all cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The miniplate is advantageously positioned to resist tensile forces induced by mastication while allowing compressive load transfer through the mandibular bone fragments. 9,10 Results of studies [11][12][13] of mandibular fracture fixation with miniplates in dogs, cats, and rabbits indicate that return to function is faster than with maxillomandibular fixation and excellent dental occlusion is achieved by direct opposition of bone fragments. In dogs, a single titanium locking reconstruction plate can be used to stabilize a critical-size defect with minimal damage to dental structures and the mandibular canal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A facilidade de manipulação e moldagem das miniplacas e dos parafusos no osso foi observada em todos os casos, a qual facilitou a ostossíntese mandibular em razão da pequena dimensão destas, sendo possível moldá-la manualmente ao contorno do osso, diferentemente das placas convencionais, que normalmente necessitam de retorcedores mais robustos e específicos (JOHNSON, 2008). BILGILI & KURUM (2003) ressaltaram que o pequeno tamanho das miniplacas e parafusos permite fácil manipulação do material e minimiza os danos aos tecidos moles adjacentes, promovendo, assim, adequada estabilidade e, por consequência, consolidação precoce das fraturas, como observado nos casos 1, 3, 4 e 5. A causa da não consolidação óssea nos dois casos deste estudo está ligada à quebra da placa no caso 2 e à deiscência dos pontos, com consequente contaminação do enxerto no caso 6, e não propriamente pela aplicação das miniplacas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A quebra do parafuso pode estar relacionada à colocação do parafuso acidentalmente inclinado e não coincidir com o furo da cortical, acarretando na sobrecarga do colo e fratura na transição. Essa complicação também foi observada por outros autores (BOUDRIEAU & KUDISCH, 1996;BILGILI & KURUM, 2003). Entretanto, essa complicação não ocorreu com o sistema 2,0mm neste trabalho, justamente pelo maior tamanho e pela consequentemente maior rigidez em comparação com o sistema 1,5mm.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation