1992
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199207000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia Using the Ilizarov Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
102
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition is due to a high position of the fibular distal epiphysis and because of an asymmetric growth of the distal tibial physis that grows more medially than laterally [2,10]. In our study, five patients had a persistent pseudarthrosis of the fibula, but only three of these developed ankle valgus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This condition is due to a high position of the fibular distal epiphysis and because of an asymmetric growth of the distal tibial physis that grows more medially than laterally [2,10]. In our study, five patients had a persistent pseudarthrosis of the fibula, but only three of these developed ankle valgus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new technique in the treatment of CPT adapted to atrophic types. Today, the best results to achieve bone union have been reported using vascularized fibular grafting [8,9] and Ilizarov intercalary bone transport [10,11]. The transfer of healthy vascularized bone in the first case and increasing blood flow by proximal corticotomy and diaphyseal transfer in the second creates a favorable vascular environment for union while compensating for bone defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several treatments for congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia have been de- 1985), free vascularized fibular grafts (Hagan and Buncke 1982, Pho et al 1985, Weiland et al 1990), electrical stimulation (Bassett and Schink-Ascani 1991) and, recently, external fixation ( Paley et al 1992, Boero et al 1997, Ghanem et al 1997, Guidera et al 1997. Amputation remained a treatment option because success rates remained extremely low (Paterson 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amputation remained a treatment option because success rates remained extremely low (Paterson 1989). With the Ilizarov method (Paley et al 1992), 15/16 cases united, after the first treatment, and the remaining case after a second procedure, compared to about half the cases reported with other methods (Morrissy et al 1981, Hagan and Buncke 1982, Paterson and Simonis 1985, Pho et a1.1985.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%