1988
DOI: 10.3109/00365528809090197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Chronic Diarrhoea: Loperamide versus Ispaghula Husk and Calcium

Abstract: Twenty-five patients with chronic diarrhoea were included in an open, randomized crossover trial comparing the effect of loperamide with ispaghula and calcium. Nineteen patients completed both treatments. Before treatment the median number of daily stools was 7 (range, 4-13), stool consistency was loose in all, and urgency was present in 16 out of 19 patients. Both treatments halved stool frequency, but with regard to urgency and stool consistency ispaghula and calcium was significantly better. A combination o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, no details are known about the possible underlying mechanism(s), responsible for its medicinal use in constipation, except a preliminary report [25], and a general understanding that its effectiveness in constipation is attributed to its high fiber and mucilaginous content. Similarly, there are some reports validating the medicinal use of psyllium husk in the treatment of diarrhea [26][27][28][29], but no evidence is available explaining the mode of action of its antidiarrheal effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, no details are known about the possible underlying mechanism(s), responsible for its medicinal use in constipation, except a preliminary report [25], and a general understanding that its effectiveness in constipation is attributed to its high fiber and mucilaginous content. Similarly, there are some reports validating the medicinal use of psyllium husk in the treatment of diarrhea [26][27][28][29], but no evidence is available explaining the mode of action of its antidiarrheal effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Only 20 % of individuals with slow transit responded to psyllium. A slightly greater percentage (37 %) of those with disorders of defecation -including rectocele, internal prolapse, anismus, and rectal hyposensitivity -found improvement (Alternative Medicine Review 2002; Voderholzer et al 1997;Kumar et al 1987;Qvitzau et al 1988). …”
Section: Constipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a pectin supplement did not increase macronutrient or energy absorption (1768 vs. 1477 kcal/day, p = 0.15); faecal wet weight (1582 vs 1689 g/day, p = 1.00) and urine production (1615 vs. 1610 ml/d, p = 1.00) remained constant [22]. SBS patients with a colon in continuity report beneficial effects of ispaghula husk and calcium on stool viscosity and consistency, which may ameliorate the sensation of urgency [23]. Some patients with an end ostomy will report benefit from the use of fiber supplements as they help to gelatinize the ostomy effluent.…”
Section: Oral Dietmentioning
confidence: 82%