No abstract

The present meta-analysis of intestinal cancer risk in CD, based on population-based studies only, revealed an overall increased risk of both CRC and small bowel cancer among patients with CD. However, some of the available data were several decades old, and future studies taking new treatment strategies into account are required.

In recent years, endoscopically placed endoprosthesis has become an alternative to traditional operative biliary-digestive bypass in palliative treatment of patients with non-resectable biliary obstruction caused by malignant stricture of the extrahepatic bile duct. In an uncontrolled series the endoscopic approach has been recommended as the treatment of choice.' Alternatively surgery has been recommended primarily because 13% of the survivors needed a later operation for duodenal obstruction.2 The combined intraoperative and postoperative mortality (30 days mortality) after bypass surgery is reported to be 15-30%,2 and the corresponding mortality for the endoscopic approach 10-18%.'3 The procedure related mortality of endoprosthesis insertion was low (0-2%),' and success rates in the application of the stent were high (90%).' Sonnenfeld et al' reported a non-randomised comparison of endoprosthesis versus bypass with 20 patients in each group and found no difference in survival, but the

Background and Purpose-Strokes have especially devastating implications if they occur early in life; however, only limited information exists on the characteristics of acute cerebrovascular disease in young adults. Although risk factors and manifestation of atherosclerosis are commonly associated with stroke in the elderly, recent data suggests different causes for stroke in the young. We initiated the prospective, multinational European study Stroke in Young Fabry Patients (sifap) to characterize a cohort of young stroke patients. Methods-Overall, 5023 patients aged 18 to 55 years with the diagnosis of ischemic stroke (3396) *Drs Rolfs, Fazekas and Grittner contributed equally to this work. Authors contributions: Dr Rolfs has conceptualized, initiated, and designed and organized the study, has been involved in the recruitment of the patients, and wrote significant parts of the manuscript. Dr Fazekas was involved in the study planning and has done together with Drs Enzinger and Schmidt the analysis of all MRI scans; this group was mainly involved in the statistical analysis of the MRI data. Drs Martus, Grittner, Holzhausen have taken responsibility for all statistical analysis and for the data structure of the total data bank. Drs Dichgans, Böttcher, Tatlisumak, Tanislav, Jungehulsing, Putaala, Huber, Bodechtel, Lichy, Hennerici, Kaps, Meyer, Kessler have been most active in the recruitment of the patients, drafting the manuscript and significantly influencing the scientific discussion. Dr Heuschmann was involved in drafting the manuscript and influencing the scientific discussion. Dr Norrving chaired the steering and publication committees of sifap, has written parts of the manuscript, and has significantly influenced the scientific discussions. Drs Lackner and Paschke, H. Mascher, Dr Riess have been involved in the laboratory analyses. Dr Kolodny has mostly contributed to the discussion of the Fabry cases. Dr Giese assisted in writing and editing the manuscript. All authors have reviewed, critically revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.The sponsors of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The academic authors had unrestricted access to the derived dataset, and assume full responsibility for the completeness, integrity, and interpretation of the data, as well as writing the study report and the decision to submit for publication.†Listed in Appendix I in the online-only Data Supplement. Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, was guest editor for this article.