1989
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90233-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of caustic ingestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably because that the most common offending chemical agent is concentrated liquid alkali (lye, drain cleaners, and similar readily available household products). These agents are easily swallowed; enter the esophagus and stomach and cause the maximal damage there, sparing the oral cavity [6]. In this case, the offending agent (acid) was cleared from the mouth before it could be swallowed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably because that the most common offending chemical agent is concentrated liquid alkali (lye, drain cleaners, and similar readily available household products). These agents are easily swallowed; enter the esophagus and stomach and cause the maximal damage there, sparing the oral cavity [6]. In this case, the offending agent (acid) was cleared from the mouth before it could be swallowed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkali cause severe liquefaction necrosis and injury that extend beyond the submucosa. [15][16][17] After a review of the English literature, only few reports were found discussing the management of Type II and III contractures and included the use of skin grafts, cultured mucosal epithelial grafts, naso-labial flaps, radial forearm free flaps and jejunal free flaps. 16 -20 The use of skin grafts and cultured mucosal grafts without splinting are associated with a high-risk of recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They produce a liquefaction necrosis, which exposes progressively deeper layers of tissue to the caustic agent and causes much more extensive injuries. [6][7][8][9] Stricture of the esophagus develops in 25 to 35 percent of patients with caustic esophageal burns. 7,10 Esophageal stricture is often treated by bouginage and, with conservative treatment, most patients will be able to eat normally without esophageal replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In most reports of esophageal reconstruction following caustic ingestion, the patients were treated with colonic interpositions. [8][9][10][11] In cases such as our third patient, whose lesions were localized to the cervical portion of the esophagus, reconstruction by free jejunal interposition can be the first choice. Free jejunal transfer has been adopted for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction after standard total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy because of its advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%