1974
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197456060-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment for Legg-Perthes Disease with the Newington Ambulation-Abduction Brace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Containment of the vulnerable and biologically plastic femoral head in the acetabulum early in the disease was believed to result in a more spherical head during the repair process, thereby resulting in a more congruent joint. 6 Non-operative containment treatment has involved different braces, [7][8][9][10][11] whereas surgical containment includes varus osteotomy of the proximal femur, [12][13][14] or various types of innominate osteotomy [15][16][17] to redirect the acetabulum and thereby improve femoral head cover. Most studies on treatment are retrospective, with a relatively small number of patients and without a control group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Containment of the vulnerable and biologically plastic femoral head in the acetabulum early in the disease was believed to result in a more spherical head during the repair process, thereby resulting in a more congruent joint. 6 Non-operative containment treatment has involved different braces, [7][8][9][10][11] whereas surgical containment includes varus osteotomy of the proximal femur, [12][13][14] or various types of innominate osteotomy [15][16][17] to redirect the acetabulum and thereby improve femoral head cover. Most studies on treatment are retrospective, with a relatively small number of patients and without a control group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, treatment may attempt to prevent hip joint deformity by containment of the femoral head in the acetabulum during the active phases. The most widely used methods of containing the femoral head in the acetabulum are abduction orthosis (Curtis et al 1974, Bobechko 1974, Purvis et al 1980, Martinez et al 1992 and femoral or pelvic osteotomies (Axer et al 1980, Heikkinen et al 1976, Sponseller et al 1988, Paterson et al 1991, Salter 1984. The operative containment treatment has consisted of varus osteotomy of the proximal part of the femur, which centers the femoral head more deeply within the acetabulum.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications included muscular atrophy, osteopenia, shortening of the involved extremity, loss of thoracal kyphosis, and urinary caliculi. (Harrison and Menon 1966, Harrison et al 1969, Curtis et al 1974, Brotherton and Mc Kibbin 1977, Martinez et al 1992. Fortunately, long-time recumbency treatment is currently considered as malpractice and abandoned altogether.…”
Section: Non-containment Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the limitations of this examination are that the sizes of the osteochondral femoral head and acetabulum, their shapes and their relationships to one another cannot be accurately assessed; thus the type and severity of the lesion may be incompletely appreciated. It has been shown that containment treatment of the femoral head gives the best opportunity for the development of a spherical head at the end of the regeneration process (Axer 1965 Axer et al 1973, Curtis et al 1974, Brotherton & McKibbin 1977, Salter et al 1977). The problem is to assess the degree of rotation of the femur (or pelvis) required to achieve adequate containment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%